k_paleologos

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by k_paleologos 4y ago

   "During the investigation, the Committee received information from industry experts and current and former Huawei employees suggesting that Huawei, in particular, may be violating United States laws. " This is a claim which can on
2. 2.▲
   by k_paleologos 4y ago

   What government can do is limited by the constitution. Generally speaking, unless these companies have done something unlawful there is no ground for banning their products. Is it established that they have broken US laws?
3. 3.▲
   by k_paleologos 4y ago

   Is government involvement problematic? Many firms have government involvement, often in an under the table manner. For example Airbus. Government involvement is in itself no grounds for banning a company.
4. 4.▲
   by k_paleologos 4y ago

   Is this an executive measure? Does the executive have authority to do such a thing, based on vague and nebulous claims of threat to national security? Were these companies providing sevices/supplying goods in the US market subject to n
5. 5.▲
   by k_paleologos 4y ago

   Why should the government decide which apps a user can install in their device?
6. 6.▲
   by k_paleologos 4y ago

   Reports suggest that they require only 3 launches in this configuration LM5B where the core stage falls back, for the construction of their station. They might have made the assumption that chances of damage due to debris is very low consid