Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
justsee
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
42 ms
·
121.
▲
by
justsee
9y ago
Your critique of Brave doesn't square with my understanding of the Brave ecosystem since I started seriously following it just before the BAT ICO. This technical interview with Eich was extremely illuminating and I'd urge you to w
122.
▲
Automation
(bellacaledonia.org.uk)
1 points
by
justsee
9y ago
|
0 comments
123.
▲
by
justsee
9y ago
We have a number of Next sites in development at the moment, but none in production (soon!). SEO shouldn't be a problem, especially as the initial page is serverside rendered. The only slight complexity is in returning sitemap.xml I be
124.
▲
by
justsee
9y ago
I had this same initial reaction, but concluded as others have that this architectural approach was not actually a separation of concerns but merely an unwieldy separation of technologies: http://blog.andrewray.me/youre-miss
125.
▲
by
justsee
9y ago
React is great for web development (using Next.js) based on my recent experience. Citing only one side of any architectural trade-offs isn't particularly interesting either. The other side is that we can now easily build sites using Un
126.
▲
by
justsee
10y ago
In the context of Next.js's serverside-rendering approach, Polymer has an open ticket about providing support for SSR: https://github.com/Polymer/polymer/issues/3955 .
127.
▲
by
justsee
10y ago
cli-kit is rather comprehensive, well-thought out, and modular too if you're looking for Node options: https://github.com/cli-kit/cli-toolkit
128.
▲
by
justsee
11y ago
It's possible to determine negative externalities before a product goes to market, and this 'pre-filter' regulatory framework and barrier to entry is decidedly not 'free market'. Any solution that does not implement
129.
▲
by
justsee
11y ago
I don't think you've read the investment chapter [1]. It isn't a 'secret court': * 9.23.1 Documents from the complainant are submitted and they should "make them available to the public" * 9.23.2 "Th
130.
▲
by
justsee
11y ago
> But just imagine calling Picasso "the mercurial Spaniard" when talking to a friend. Consider the UK talking heads landscape is filled with individuals with a formidable command of the English language and pg's example co
131.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
> Nonsense. Slack is very beautiful with everything around the core feature, but the core feature is awful... Well obviously we disagree on this point, as to me something being beautiful necessarily has to encompass the UX, and I think t
132.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Slack executes so much better at every level that stating it's a wash between Slack and HipChat just doesn't compute. One key example is the multiple teams feature: the ability to have multiple accounts logged in at the same time,
133.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Ah bolo - so many schooltime lunches engrossed in the magic of network gaming. It was nice to see it got ported to Windows / Linux too: http://www.winbolo.com/ . And of course, JavaScript: http://stephank.git
134.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Your use of an imagined ignorant politician wielding the phrase 'scientific consensus' in the affirmative as a disagreeable act seems odd to me. It is generally the 'skeptic' ignorantly asserting 'there is no consen
135.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Here is a write-up of my experience doing that particular 10 day meditation course, which I'm surprised to discover wrapped up almost 10 years to the day: http://weblog.squareapple.net/archives/2004/11/26
136.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Hey dang - I noticed the comment below I made which stuck to the top for most of this thread's life dropped to the bottom at the time you commented here. What's the process for penalising posts in this situation? Is it just an ind
137.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
1. The primary non-rechargeable battery was designed to power it for a whole week. 2. The secondary rechargeable battery was designed to continue powering it for months after that. The detail you include is only relevant to 2, and keep in m
138.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Do you think changing the mission target of a 12 year mission on the day of landing has a scientific or bureaucratic / political motive? I'm inclined to believe it is the latter. Until 12 November the FAQ [1] stated: During the f
139.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
I'm just raising the kind of precise, detail-oriented questions that typically emanate from this community. Your response relies on an appeal to emotion rather than logic, and doesn't seem particularly interested in engaging with
140.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
As late as 12 November, the ESA's own FAQ [1] was stating that Philae's minimum mission target was one week of surface operation (powered entirely by primary batteries), with even more operational time powered by back-up batteri
141.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Well the memory leaks and approach to fallback connections led to it being more sensible to roll our own. We've only needed to handle concurrent connections in the 1-10k range though. There are really better c++ and erlang implementati
142.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Isn't it more likely their realtime functionality will be integrated or merged with whatever WebSocket initiatives Google has running? Look at their Google Play services: Android and iOS get realtime, and web is relegated to using a RE
143.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
When building our realtime platform we quickly realised socket.io fell over spectacularly with serious traffic, and that all other hefty realtime services did not use it. There has been lots of movement with the bigger release but nothing t
144.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
I'm not sure a few pages of 3d printers covering a price range from $140-$846 000 is really any evidence of over-saturation. How do we determine this? An equivalent list of 2d printers would be significantly longer.
145.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
> IMO Docker + etcd is a far more sane configuration than endless Ruby Chef scripts, or worse, Amazon OpsWorks. For what use case? Doesn't using Docker for everything take you into 'golden master image' dead-ends, as outli
146.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Your comment is terribly misinformed about the reality of drug research. I'd urge you to at least read that opening paragraph I linked to up-thread from the 'Bad Pharma' book. If you have an interest in this area I would imag
147.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
> Don't get me wrong: funding bias is a problem, but it gets overstated. Hardly. It is in fact far worse than you are attempting to imply, and is covered in detail in Bad Pharma[1] which is well worth reading. A snippet: "Drugs
148.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Congratulations on shipping! Rolling up your sleeves for some location-based, real-time coding would have been a bit of fun right? Giants like Twitter have obviously had location-based tweets for a long time but a sizable segment of those u
149.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Yes, I would be one of those 'Some', but preferred to respond to your characterisation of the issue.
150.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
> It was a stupid thing to add to the release - it not only attempts to smear Abbot, it is also borderline racist. Exactly my sentiments. Adding in commentary like this immediately weakens the broader points, which is unfortunate.
More ›