Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
justsee
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
151.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
That exists: https://help.github.com/articles/searching-issues#involves
152.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Is this real data or are you just going on gut feel?
153.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Where do you go to get this definitive data on HN activities?
154.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
> Anyone that is against Super PACs and "getting money out of politics" is arguing that speech needs to be reduced. No they're arguing Super PACs distort and limit healthy, democratic speech; that Super PACs are detrimenta
155.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
I think you can safely assume "a lady" is merely descriptive, and not accusatory, unless you're searching for prose to be offended by. If it was a man, and the sentence included "a man" I could also imagine a snide
156.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
> My usage is absolutely common parlance. Maybe in your particular social or intellectual circles, but not in common parlance. This is obvious by comparing the dictionary definition with your definition: the former is general and widely
157.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
> In (fairly) common parlance, "regulation" means governmental rules that violate individual sovereignty. Common parlance is found on Wikipedia: "A regulation is a rule or law designed to control or govern conduct." T
158.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
> A problem with "deregulation" is that unless all regulations are being removed it's hard to tell what the new state of regulation will be. Yes it appears to be a fatal problem, considering an area with no regulations wha
159.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
> But... International rules that enforce a reduction in national rules (deregulation) which will empower multi-nationals is not the contradiction you appear to think it is. > These multi-nationals are purely a product of regulaiton (
160.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Judging by your hostility and focus I think my point (which I don't think is trivial to those working with the web) wasn't clearly communicated. The best of modern web designers embody that philosophical approach in regards to t
161.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
> This is part of Steve’s legacy. Deep in the culture of Apple is this sense and understanding of design, developing and making. Form and the material and process – they are beautifully intertwined – completely connected. This is also tr
162.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
> My moral framework requires consent from human beings as for other creatures i see no problem experimenting with them as log as we put in the best effort possible in reducing their suffering in the process Consent is only possible in h
163.
▲
by
justsee
12y ago
Your moral framework appears to give a pass to any activities another person is capable of doing, which doesn't appear to be much of a framework at all. In particular, it would also logically support any experimentation on live humans
164.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
Also, for a long time 'sosumi' was the div class for Apple's copyright links in the footer on their website [1]. The joke appears to have been removed on the current site. [1] https://web.archive.org/web/
165.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
I expect time travelers will agree on a responsible prescience disclosure system which uses something like http://www.proofofexistence.com/about .
166.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
The issue is the TPP process. You largely continue to avoid this, addressing it upthread in an 'it will help speed things up, I'm okay with it' way. An unsatisfactory, superficial response to some very deep issues. The commen
167.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
> not actually true. The final text would most certainly be public; you're probably referring to... Yes, the final text , if it becomes law, will be public. The leaked texts show how dedicated the negotiators are to weakening sov
168.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
What stunning misdirection in this thread by anigbrowl. In a way it reflects the NY Times opinion piece, which tries to simply characterise the TPP as a 'trade deal'. Any reasonable, honest observer would halt the discussion immed
169.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
> thus irregularities such as an individual voting multiple times as a deceased person would not be able to be detected. That doesn't seem correct. Voters need to provide identification and their fingerprints (!) as part of the voti
170.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
"Chávez himself read my findings on potential elections theft – to his nation on his TV show – and then he moved swiftly, establishing an election system that Jimmy Carter, who has headed vote observer teams in 92 nations, called, 
171.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
No, I think the unbelievable people are supporting the gradual release as they feel it maximises the impact of the revelations, for the public good. What with news cycles and short attention spans and everything. You seem to disagree, but d
172.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
> Yet a democratically-elected government made a decision in the name of the people to replace this park with a shopping mall. No, it appears rampant corruption in the construction industry (with the perception it is privately benefitin
173.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
You can experiment with a language-lovers language that compiles to multiple targets. Many of the quirks and frustrations that you may only hit on a project-by-project basis are constantly raised and solved in the community, so you get a br
174.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
This was an entertaining talk from CCC in 2011 on desktop Linux. 'datenwolf' was the speaker, and he starts talking about sound in Linux here. [1] He's quickly interrupted by the maintainer of PulseAudio, and this interruption continues thr
175.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
I find it curious you would not consider education a significant variable. Education and intelligence mean there's a significant variation in people's abilities to infer, to the point that particularly talented people get write-ups in 'Guin
176.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
Intentionally ironic , in that I held myself to the same standards as your comment: ad hominems mixed with personal insight and no content.
177.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
You also seem to follow a script when you veer away from technical topics. If the topic is political or economic and likely to provide a runway for some sort of frustration-at-establishment chatter, I regularly expect you to appear and enga
178.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
Don't you see any similarities between your comment's sense of propriety and the traders? It's not about whether people can have a joke, it's that people of that mindset should not be anywhere near global levers of capitalism. Like they sho
179.
▲
by
justsee
13y ago
It is not speculation. They actually did fix prices in this casual manner. The UK FSA Final Notice documents many transcripts just like this as evidence of the unethical, unprofessional, dysfunctional culture [1]. [1] http://www.fsa.gov.uk
180.
▲
by
justsee
14y ago
> Let's not kid ourselves. The Australian market is tiny. I don't know if you're being willfully ignorant in your responses, but I can add to my comment: "...for a whole country completely changes the tech startup landscape for that co
More ›