julias

4 ms·

1.
by julias 17y ago
The user charts do not include any users from before July 2008. But we should have mentioned our history more clearly, at least in the English blog posts, that's right.
2.
by julias 17y ago
Thanks for pointing us to the SBW, sunir. We did stumple upon it already, but will explore it further.
3.
by julias 17y ago
Interesting comment, thanks revorad. Did you realize the price is per user, not per account? We feel the price is in the higher middle-range, feels adequate to us. We're not cosidering to increase it at the moment.
4.
by julias 17y ago
2) + 3) + 4): possible with mite. 1) client only isn't possible, but project only or service only. Sorry to hear you missed those existing features.
5.
by julias 17y ago
The drop corresponds to December '08. We think this occured simply because of the holiday season. When the trial expired, people weren't working => didn't read the email => didn't convert. Another point: our numbers are so low, in g
6.
by julias 17y ago
I can't prove that with numbers, but oh yes, we think the API is one of our key "success" points! One, the API helped us a great deal in terms of features / suporting different plattforms. Have a look: http://mite.yo.lk/en/platform/ – thi
7.
by julias 17y ago
Thanks for your great input! We'd love to keep the tool easy, therefore we'll keep focusing on tracking and analyzing time only. That said, you're totally right: partnering makes sense. Therefore, we do offer an API. Three invoicing apps al
8.
by julias 17y ago
Why yes, we can, from the very beginning. The expenses do include our salaries.
9.
by julias 17y ago
Hamburger, I assume ;) We started with monthly €1,300/founder. Today, we're paying us €2.500/founder.
10.
by julias 17y ago
Yes, of course: the biggest factor are our salaries – we're raising them steadily as we're making more money. The second (minor) factor is that some costs are rising depending on the number of customers/users, such as payment or server cost