jtbayly

57 ms·

961.
by jtbayly 4y ago
What company!!!??? Please don't just leave all of us hoping we aren't the unlucky guy that is using that company.
962.
by jtbayly 4y ago
> late at night I would drive by there would sometimes be people inside scurrying about Sounds like the cleaners.
963.
by jtbayly 4y ago
That’s reason enough to disbar a lawyer. I hope she reported him.
964.
by jtbayly 4y ago
I don’t have the money to hire a lawyer for this, unless I’m able to pay the lawyer out of the 250k.
965.
by jtbayly 4y ago
But it can’t be income if he has to give it back, which is the starting assumption here.
966.
by jtbayly 4y ago
This isn’t true in my experience in the US. House purchase wired to slightly wrong account number. Stressful that money hadn’t shown up at closing, but it was resolved within a day.
967.
by jtbayly 4y ago
Won't somebody think of the children?! ;)
968.
by jtbayly 4y ago
How do the launderers have access to thousands of accounts? And why wouldn't the actual owners of the accounts report the transactions?
969.
by jtbayly 4y ago
The exception that proves the rule.
970.
by jtbayly 4y ago
…which they would do via government.
971.
by jtbayly 4y ago
Ha! “Fungible” is the word I settled on, too.
972.
by jtbayly 4y ago
That’s an absurd analogy that doesn’t fit at all. FB uses the data it can’t find or tell you anything about to successfully sell ad space to third parties targeted back at you. Let’s make it concrete. We know FB keeps track of which webpage
973.
by jtbayly 4y ago
> The special master at times seemed in disbelief, as when he questioned the engineers over whether any documentation existed for a particular Facebook subsystem. “Someone must have a diagram that says this is where this data is stored,”
974.
by jtbayly 4y ago
The code isn’t law, apparently.
975.
by jtbayly 4y ago
I feel that after a few hours of not eating. Is feeling it or not feeling it the sign that I've reached the necessary effect?
976.
by jtbayly 4y ago
Yes. But even assuming a desire to limit verification to notable people, it seems very odd that minor musicians are allowed but not minor actors.
977.
by jtbayly 4y ago
Love the site. Thanks for sharing.
978.
by jtbayly 4y ago
You’re begging the question. They are only offenders at all because the law against residential use has been passed. The claim is that it’s a useless law, and your response is to say that people should be punished under the law.
979.
by jtbayly 4y ago
But, as has been pointed out many times in this thread already, it’s not because of pools and lawns.
980.
by jtbayly 4y ago
I assume you're being facetious?
981.
by jtbayly 4y ago
How do you block internet if it will join open networks automatically?
982.
by jtbayly 4y ago
Agreed. Deduplication should be the bigger goal, in my opinion.
983.
by jtbayly 4y ago
This article was old, apparently, but this is what made me think it would have a big impact: > Twenty-seven seizure orders were issued to large truck operators from outside the province, banning them from operating any commercial motor v
984.
by jtbayly 4y ago
This... could backfire tremendously. It's like they really don't realize how dependent we all are on truck-delivered goods. Now that the supply chain crunch is getting under control, let's make it worse again!
985.
by jtbayly 4y ago
We aren’t talking about an investigation. We’re talking about an FBI agent intentionally hiding and destroying evidence. Exculpatory evidence.
986.
by jtbayly 4y ago
No end user agrees with you that it affected them negatively. They all made the choice to turn it off and still have the choice to turn it back on. We like the trade offs.
987.
by jtbayly 4y ago
If you want to be tracked, go ahead and turn it on! That’s up to you.
988.
by jtbayly 4y ago
I don't follow. How is hiding recordings that would exonerate the senator different from attacking the senator?
989.
by jtbayly 4y ago
If the evidence he deleted was exculpatory, the correct question is why one FBI is attacking a senator, right?
990.
It might be time for companies in San Francisco to call employees’ bluff(techcrunch.com)
2 points by jtbayly 4y ago|0 comments

More ›