5 ms·
If the evidence he deleted was exculpatory, the correct question is why one FBI is attacking a senator, right?
by jtbayly 4y ago
If the evidence he deleted was exculpatory, the correct question is why one FBI is attacking a senator, right?
- russh 4y agoI suspect he was not attacking the senator but covering his ass because he only turned over the recordings that would be bad for the senators case.
- jtbayly 4y agoI don't follow. How is hiding recordings that would exonerate the senator different from attacking the senator?
- ncmncm 4y agoThe withheld recordings might just have led the jury to distrust witnesses. Or, might have implicated other people besides. Doesn't mean the pol wasn't a crook. Or that the agent wasn't. There is often more than enough blame to go around, but prosecutors like things to look simple.
- kastagg 4y agoAn investigation is not an attack. Are Senators above the law?
- jtbayly 4y agoWe aren’t talking about an investigation. We’re talking about an FBI agent intentionally hiding and destroying evidence. Exculpatory evidence.