jsnell

67 ms·

901.
by jsnell 3y ago
There are multiple uses for keys. I've published a key so that people can verify the signatures on some software releases. I don't expect anyone to try sending me an email encrypted with that key. And I really wouldn't expect
902.
by jsnell 3y ago
Oh, do tell! What is the method?
903.
by jsnell 3y ago
It seems to say that under some circumstances a phone will report its location (indirectly over an e2e encrypted network) to the owner of a bluetooth device that's in range of the phone. It doesn't say that the phone is constantly
904.
by jsnell 3y ago
That doesn't seem like an accurate paraphrase at all. The article says nothing about polling constantly, nor does it make any kind of suggestion that polling constantly is what makes it secure.
905.
by jsnell 3y ago
It's obviously timed to the Google Cloud Next conference, which starts today.
906.
by jsnell 3y ago
This is content marketing. Rule number one is to find some kind of angle that can generate viral engagement no matter how thin the actual content is. Outrage tends to be a good hook. Acknowledging something as a hard problem, not so much.
907.
by jsnell 3y ago
Yes, but what does any of this have to do with TTL? Are you maybe confusing IP packet TTL with DNS record TTL?
908.
by jsnell 3y ago
This proposal isn't meant for preventing scraping, and isn't useful in any way for that. The only TPM operations that it makes available are: 1. Create a new keypair on the client, and register the public key with the server. 2. R
909.
by jsnell 3y ago
What's so confusing about it? This team did a lot of work to create JPEG XL. For whatever reason, Chrome is not agreeing to ship it, which will make it a lot harder for it to be widely adopted. So they're now applying the same tec
910.
by jsnell 3y ago
First, this is work by the team that co-designed JPEG XL. Second, as far as I can tell this is a JPEG encoding library, producing JPEG files that any existing JPEG decoder will be able to read. Nobody is being asked to support or maintain a
911.
by jsnell 3y ago
That's not the Internet Archive (archive.org). The paywall circumvention links are at archive.is
912.
by jsnell 3y ago
No. The payload was in the checked in test files, but the test files were inert. They were only activated by the tarball having different build files than the repository (or rather, different build files than would be generated by autotools
913.
by jsnell 3y ago
The numbers from the article are 422k deliveries in Q1 2023, 386k in Q1 2024. That's down by almost 10%, not up.
914.
by jsnell 3y ago
> It lets people with a better grasp of the rules take advantage of opponents making mistakes, or setting traps for them to fall into > They are a bit complex but they aren't as hard to learn as you're claiming! You're
915.
by jsnell 3y ago
It's not just that there's only two Christmases. It's that Christmas fell on Sunday in 2022 and Monday in 2023, and the article already established the attacker mainly worked Tuesday-Friday. The note about the attacker never
916.
by jsnell 3y ago
You either win, and every opposing sequence of tiles that touches the tile you just played is removed, or lose and each of your sequences of tiles including the tile you just played is removed. But it's not just because you played an i
917.
by jsnell 3y ago
Some more feedback after trying to play the game again in a mode where I'd at least be certain of the outcome of my own moves: - Opening the dictionary lookup requires two clicks, and then a third to focus the text entry. It needs a ho
918.
by jsnell 3y ago
I don't think that's a good analogy. In chess, there's no question of how a move will resolve. You might not be able to predict the future consequences of the move, but every single player will always know without error what
919.
by jsnell 3y ago
Congrats on both launching and on the unique game design. This desperately needs a attack result preview, or if that's too hard at least a "you're starting an attack you'll lose" warning of some kind. The combat res
920.
by jsnell 3y ago
No. To repeat: the client is sending a pure ACK with no data. You can see that packet with a 0 byte payload length in the screenshot. That packet is also getting lost; if it weren't getting lost, we'd be receiving a SYNACK.
921.
by jsnell 3y ago
I mean, yes, that was my instinctive response based on just the title. It's always the MTU. But in this case the packet that's being lost is a pure ACK.
922.
by jsnell 3y ago
It's not a side hustle. It's probably about 20-25% of their profits.
923.
by jsnell 3y ago
Thanks, I was going just by the OP. Then I'd have to imagine that the problem is with the "not now" button.
924.
by jsnell 3y ago
I can see that some people would think that, but it's a design that was converged on after several iterations and seems to have worked for both the regulators and the companies. I think both of the previous examples actually started wi
925.
by jsnell 3y ago
Having Safari hardcoded to the first position in the list certainly won't fly. The Windows browser choice ballot and the Android search engine choice screens eventually settled on a two tier with the five most popular options in a rand
926.
by jsnell 3y ago
I would have thought every server maker was able to sell every GPU they got their hands on at this point in the hype cycle. If SuperMicro is gaining market share, isn't it just a sign that Nvidia is giving them a bigger GPU allocation?
927.
by jsnell 3y ago
Non-paywalled version of the original paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01160 It feels like a kind of a parochial and underdeveloped argument though, basically taking it for granted that the only path to a technologica
928.
by jsnell 3y ago
Of course it matters! It means Google doesn't actually get to say how Mozilla runs Firefox. They have a contract for a service ("make us the default search for the next N years, and we'll pay you X% revenue share on those sea
929.
by jsnell 3y ago
Without Google, Mozilla would be selling their default search setting to the next highest bidder instead. They've done so in the past (selling the US search box to Yahoo). It's a bit of an odd market, since there aren't that
930.
by jsnell 3y ago
I don't think it was intended to be a children's game; they're not the target market for Google I/O. But also, in this be situation there isn't much positive to be said about the game. Everything about it is badly d

More ›