Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jsankey
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
241.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
Or import less. If the transit was more energy efficient, or just less reliant on oil, it could have some impact.
242.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
What I know how to do best is the app store, but I want other type of things that do not require much time investment, but give as good returns as that. What do I do with the money? How do I invest it in making more money quickly? Little
243.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
It helps to think of how poorly "real" companies perform. I mean, which software vendor ships bug free products? It's a fantasy: and the difference is that startups (that care) can turn around fixes in the blink of an eye. This leads int
244.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
Also: Employees using IE6, inside Google, in 2010. Why weren't they using Chrome? I guess they were testing something in IE6. Perhaps one of their own sites. Perhaps how some other site renders in it compared to Chrome. Who knows.
245.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
They might if they tried it! It's quite like poultry, the flavour is not at all challenging to anyone that eats chicken. It was once common to eat them in Sydney; in fact my dad tells of a rabbit man that would sell them door-to-door when
246.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
There are at least two: 1) The Maven Ant tasks: http://maven.apache.org/ant-tasks/index.html 2) Ivy (now part of the Ant project): http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ We use Ant+Ivy, and although it has some quirks Ivy works well enough for depe
247.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
This sounds interesting, but unfortunately I was unable to find any more significant information about the tests. It seems that it's mentioned in a few of Sugarman's books but that's it. In particular I'm interested in how controlled the
248.
▲
O'Reilly Android Apps Gaining Ground on iPhone
(radar.oreilly.com)
12 points
by
jsankey
17y ago
|
8 comments
249.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
Your comment might be more constructive if your offered the OP a solution to their actual problem of tiling two windows (or perhaps the underlying need to compare the contents of two windows easily). What affordances does OSX offer in this
250.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
It's an interesting idea but I think the major problem is many people are in jobs too far from what they are really interested in or enjoy. They've made safe choices based on the fact that they need money to live. Although pouring all the
251.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
The best part is that you don't have to look at the tower: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%BDi%C5%BEkov_Television_Tow... A communist-era classic.
252.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
Not necessarily: maybe Google also wants to use some of the acquired technology, which they now can in its open source form. They're just not stopping anyone else from using it.
253.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
Yes - it strikes me that this is not so much navigating like someone in India , but navigating more like many (most?) people do in practice. I tend to like knowing which way is north, and using that, but I've found explaining things using
254.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
But this doesn't seem to be their target market. The simplicity of installation, and the website, point to home users. If you're running a data center you probably already have more sophisticated systems in place.
255.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
First: you need good test coverage, so that you can refactor and restructure with confidence. Then, I would look into dividing up the code base a bit. Usually once you get to a certain size you'll be able to identify useful bits and pieces
256.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
> always feeling guilty when I'm not working This I can relate to as a big problem when you start working on your own company. It took me a long time to realise how counter-productive this is, and to free myself to start saying "yes" m
257.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
It's one counter example of many, though (indeed you neglected a second in the original comment). Most people don't enjoy their jobs, but many do, and in a huge variety of fields. People that aren't happy shouldn't be told that there is n
258.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
I think the key part is to not worry too much about the actual number. Seek out the right job, and the right people to work with. From experience I can say if you find yourself around smart people you'll learn more in the first 3 weeks
259.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
Where the key word is correct . It would be very easy to spread a bogus story via, e.g. Twitter. It would be debunked quite quickly too -- but the fact that it can happen devalues the speed with which things are reported. Those in the p
260.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
You can get by without having to learn much directly about Java - just by picking bits and pieces up as you need them. But the value in learning the underlying platform, and indeed a key reason why these languages target the platform, is t
261.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
More importantly, you might not need those features ever...
262.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
This is even more glaring in the flawed movie analogy. Consumers of movies are not just paying for the experience of the movie. The movie itself is the main distinguishing factor. There is no "perfect competition" across all movies as th
263.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
"People should not have to be slick and commercial sounding to get a chance at your attention." In a perfect world, I agree. But when you're marketing a product, you need to deal in the real world, and the first impression counts. Persona
264.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
Opening the platform doesn't necessarily imply opening the app store. Just let other people run stores (or simply host apps for download). Re: the impact on Apple's brand, see the original article for reasons why the current model doesn't
265.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
I think the difference between the best practices for "lean startups" vs "enterprise" is overstated. The benefits of fast feedback still apply to large projects - the only real difference is that big companies won't necessarily die from in
266.
▲
Josh Harris: The Warhol of the web
(guardian.co.uk)
2 points
by
jsankey
17y ago
|
0 comments
267.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
It's too expensive to optimize for every device. Agreed. The "solution" I suggest just allows you to avoid the lowest common denominator - it doesn't make it cheap, or even viable for all devices. But for the most popular devices it s
268.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
You avoid this problem by not restricting APIs to what works on every phone, but providing optional APIs for the more capable devices. Good apps will be well integrated with multiple devices - where those devices have enough market share
269.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
Probably because if Jira works for them between $10 and $8000 is really not "lots of money"? It takes hardly any employee time to rack up that amount. I more often wonder why people value their time so little. Disclaimer: Atlassian are ac
270.
▲
by
jsankey
17y ago
This appears to completely ignore the fact that money gives you power, privilege and opportunity - and that can be used to make more money. It's not impossible to get rich from nothing, but you start with a huge disadvantage.
More ›