jrogers

5 ms·

1.
by jrogers 17y ago
@vaksel Correction, I was distinguishing the 335 from the X6, we are using the 335d. As for why not the 335i, The carbon footprint is worse than the 335d given that it is 30% less fuel efficient. We are focused on changing the impact of veh
2.
by jrogers 17y ago
Correction, I was distinguishing the 335 from the X6, we are using the 335d. As for why not the 335i, The carbon footprint is worse than the 335d given that it is 30% less fuel efficient. We are focused on changing the impact of vehicles an
3.
by jrogers 17y ago
@vaksel Correction, I was distinguishing the 335 from the X6, we are using the 335d. As for why not the 335i, The carbon footprint is worse than the 335d given that it is 30% less fuel efficient. We are focused on changing the impact of veh
4.
by jrogers 17y ago
@vaksel Correction, I was distinguishing the 335 from the X6, we are using the 335d. As for why not the 335i, The carbon footprint is worse than the 335d given that it is 30% less fuel efficient. We are focused on changing the impact of veh
5.
by jrogers 17y ago
Cool, now we are talking. Couple of thoughts. 1 - we are using the 335i engine. And it is one of 3 engine systems we have fitted for the rally fighter. So I agree. 2 - Our entire business is a revolutionary auto business model, so we are st
6.
by jrogers 17y ago
True that the site is a large proportion of design enthusiasts right now, but since that is who normally designs cars, are we any worse off than a normal car company.<br><br> If you were to jump a Bronco, it would be nothing