Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jpttsn
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
271.
▲
by
jpttsn
7y ago
What if you let the battery get wet/warm when replacing? Should the software trust that you replaced it correctly?
272.
▲
by
jpttsn
7y ago
Why would you choose to believe in a stretch? I like to think there are a few ways it could be, and try to be comfortable with not knowing which one it is e g -emergent property -solipsism -panpsychism
273.
▲
by
jpttsn
7y ago
Whoa, slow down :) I have no idea if anyone other than me is conscious. So no assumptions about humans v. animals. It’s like playing a video game. Some of the other characters insist the game is multiplayer, but how can i know they’re not j
274.
▲
by
jpttsn
7y ago
What good is my imagination as a tool for measuring consciousness? Years ago I’d have a hard time imagining RESnet. I see what you’re going for, if I really try to imagine it my brain starts ascribing consciousness to it. But that’s my poin
275.
▲
by
jpttsn
7y ago
> Now, I hear that with quantum stuff they somehow have proved it to be fundamentally random, but the point is that if you really can't tell in any way, the difference doesn't matter at all. Someone said that quantum should not
276.
▲
by
jpttsn
7y ago
I still think the difference is there even if we can’t know it. It’s the whole tree-woods-nobody thing, isn’t it? Of course the tree makes a sound. If all intelligent life in the universe was wiped, a falling rock would still make a sound.
277.
▲
by
jpttsn
7y ago
Well, maybe it would produce a hurricane on the other side of the globe. If I told a time traveling Newton how I’m replying to this on my phone, he might conclude the phone is conscious. I think the only thing we discover with this line of
278.
▲
by
jpttsn
7y ago
It’s not obvious to me. I don’t see any evidence that favors it over the alternative. Why assume that they are conscious, over the simpler hypothesis (fewer assumptions) that they aren’t?
279.
▲
by
jpttsn
7y ago
What if it’s fun, but they can program without you? Then they might choose to have fun with the highest bidder. I would program even if money was no issue. There are many who would.
280.
▲
by
jpttsn
7y ago
Maybe we will look back at today’s web, the same way we look back now at OS before protected memory was a thing.
281.
▲
by
jpttsn
7y ago
FL Studio pka FruityLoops pulled this off
282.
▲
by
jpttsn
7y ago
Switzerland is home to many successful businesses and products.
283.
▲
by
jpttsn
7y ago
Why did they win the war?
284.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
Were the pyramids also taller than the Burj Khalifa? That stretches the definition of “tall” dangerously thin.
285.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
I think you mean more of the money go to wealthy recipients, which (true or not) is different from saying there are more wealthy recipients than non-wealthy recipients (probably impossible since there are so few wealthy people).
286.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
It's cheaper to offer a 10% gift voucher than a 10% discount. Where I live, most people approve a pre-filled statement. This boosts tax revenue, because people don't think twice about deductions that are not pre-filled. It's
287.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
You're saying a larger number of rich people than non-rich people benefit from government spending? Can that possibly be true, if wealth distribution is unequal?
288.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
Call me a pedant, but I'd say OP is enabling "consensus checking" I find the present day's fact checking wave is a misnomer. In a world where something is false, but sourced, most of what we call fact-checking would on
289.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
Depends what you do, I guess. I can sometimes “pretend to enjoy” vacations, social events, games etc. Very rarely have to pretend to enjoy work.
290.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
So that's what that is. Know the feeling.
291.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
I run a small team, but we do a large number of projects. Each project is developed fast and then maintained at low intensity for a long time. Have found great use for a nifty complex DevOps pipeline. Before, when I built the same app for t
292.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
That’s not what I’m arguing against. I’m not claiming to be a better truth-seeker than the academic community. I am claiming that a lot of this truth has no meaning to me, and I’m comfortable with not seeking it. If that sounds horrible,
293.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
Is your point that most voters are hopeless infotainment addicts?
294.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
That’s a false dilemma; as long as I’m not resigned to hopeless infotainment addiction, I don’t have to believe the “least bad” reporting about events that don’t concern me.
295.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
Darn, foiled again. My sarcastic examples of useless ideas turn out to be useful. Any beginner tips for brainstorming lead into gold?
296.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
> It's awesome, because someone's done it, and no one thought to previously. It's surprising that no one's done it, because in hindsight it's obvious. I’m incredulous. What about a wristwatch made of meat? Openin
297.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
I’d call the former usersByID (if that’s what the string is)
298.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
His podcasts had him on for about six hours weekly iirc.
299.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
How much do people work on average? Would your CEO take a phone call from a client/lawyer/bank on the fifth day?
300.
▲
by
jpttsn
8y ago
Yeah, if this tech was the WMD that OpenAI says it is, the NYT would know about it.
More ›