Call me a pedant, but I'd say OP is enabling "consensus checking" I find the present day's fact checking wave is a misnomer. In a world where something is fals

Call me a pedant, but I'd say OP is enabling "consensus checking" I find the present day's fact checking wave is a misnomer. In a world where something is false, but sourced, most of what we call fact-checking would only reinforce mistruths. e.g. The ratio of circumference to diameter is exactly three to one [1][2][3] [1]: the Bible. [2]: pious scholars. [3]: low-tech experiments. Would be cool to see someone think carefully about what "real" "fact checking" would be. First-hand sources? Links to instructions for replicating findings? Consensus checking is of course also an interesting problem, albeit a pretty different one.