jorgemf

29 ms·

271.
by jorgemf 9y ago
> The physical is different from the mental. Why? Can you probe it? Most researchers I read says the opposite.
272.
by jorgemf 9y ago
> "Better-performing men are being overlooked in favor of worse-performing women/minorities." That sentence is backed if there is a correlation between genetics and skills. > this has absolutely no correlation with perf
273.
by jorgemf 9y ago
> I also wonder why Edith felt the need to mention gender not being binary in a discussion partly about whether biological sex influences choice of job, considering the fact that as far as I know biological sex is indeed binary, you eith
274.
by jorgemf 9y ago
He wrote the article as a research article. So every time he put an statement he referenced it with a research article which supports that statement. I don't understand why this is wrong. All research papers are written this way.
275.
by jorgemf 9y ago
> Consider his particular use of science and data to be sketchy I can say this for any research paper I have read in my life as all of them are incomplete and doesn't include all the research done (because you fill the top limit pag
276.
by jorgemf 9y ago
Did he? can you probe it? I found more article supporting him than not supporting him, but you might find the opposite, did you?
277.
by jorgemf 9y ago
> I disagree with his use of science and data to convert opinions into facts. Funny. So if you backed your opinions with science that is not right? It was hard to keep reading after that statement.
278.
by jorgemf 9y ago
There is a difference between having a bad teacher and not liking something. You always loved math, you didn't like how teachers were teaching you math. I have been a teacher, I know what a difference a teacher can do.
279.
by jorgemf 9y ago
Well... They said the same in the industrial era. There are a lot of things to consider, for example: - AI might not like to work, as we don't like to work - You suppose that if you create AI then the AI can create a more intelligence
280.
by jorgemf 9y ago
Not now, but if you can really create AI, it shouldn't be indistinguishable of human Intelligence. My point is that it is unlikely to make big steps now to advance in PL, but it is very likely you can do it in AI. The last 5 years have
281.
by jorgemf 9y ago
> I have told my daughter it isn’t optional to learn coding and that she must stick with it until she’s good at it and then she can choose not to do it This is what I don't understand of society. If someone is bad at something and I
282.
by jorgemf 9y ago
As a machine learning researcher I have to say that you should join us too! AI is the future! PL is an area with big challenges, but AI has even bigger challenges and the impact in the society is bigger, much bigger, too. I would change the
283.
by jorgemf 9y ago
I think the are 2 main reasons: TF is backed by Google and you can use for research and production (server & mobile) with minor changes. You can also train your TF models in the cloud without having to setup anything (as in Google Cloud
284.
by jorgemf 9y ago
It depends. Bear in mind those taxes include a public health system and public education among other things.
285.
by jorgemf 9y ago
Now in the second page. so sad...
286.
by jorgemf 9y ago
Probably you are right with the weight of flaggling. Maybe it is worth to contact the admins. But as a person who created an app for a community, this things are very difficult and no matter where do you put the limit some people are not go
287.
by jorgemf 9y ago
I don't prevent any debating flagging another post saying exactly the same than the last 3 posts (actually I agree with most of the post). You can still comment in the post (I did indeed). I do think people flagged post because they di
288.
by jorgemf 9y ago
I don't know if I understand you. We have the situation we have today because "biases and unequal opportunities".
289.
by jorgemf 9y ago
She means that aiming to 50-50 doesn't represent the skills set. As women are more skilled for that job they should have more representation (based on the biological theory). If it is a 50-50 you are promoting men in the positions when
290.
by jorgemf 9y ago
If it based on the genes because of the chromosome X and Y then I think there is no reason why it wouldn't apply to any specie with chromosomes X Y.
291.
by jorgemf 9y ago
I have to say that I flagged one of the other post because I was tired of the topic and there weren't adding anything new. But this one is outstanding.
292.
by jorgemf 9y ago
I think this is related with the XY chromosome. Because you have the Y instead of the X you have a part where you don't have 2 genes to encode a feature. So there is not gen dominant and recessive. This leads a more variation when the
293.
by jorgemf 9y ago
Completely right. I hope this is not banned because it is worth the read.
294.
by jorgemf 9y ago
Ops, I am really sorry. I kept reading and realizing that I was confused and needed to read more. That my comment could be not related and I missunderstood the concept. I wanted to take more time to read and express myself better and so I d
295.
by jorgemf 9y ago
> You should familiarise yourself with the philosophical basis of the is/ought distinction. don't assume I am not. You could be making a mistake > there is no good reason to assume that scientific inquiry, which tells us a f
296.
by jorgemf 9y ago
> nature simply is, and doesn't tell us what ought to be A lot of studies have probe the opposite (recent studies, not old ones). > I have trouble understanding why we are approaching the issue from this angle. Because you have c
297.
by jorgemf 9y ago
I said to swift, I meant from objective-c to swift. And also from swift 1 to swift 2, where problems weren't only the language but the apis an integration with the old objective-c library. I doubt it takes a couple of hours do that stu
298.
by jorgemf 9y ago
It was a way of talking. I said it that way because the migration to swift and from swift 1 to swift 2 we had the double of developers for iOs than Android and still have to wait for them because of so many issues they were having. Seems li
299.
by jorgemf 9y ago
I want to know the opinion of managers about what they think when they have to rewrite the app everytime there is a new release. I remember all the time the iOs developer spent with every iOs release. He didn't look any happy
300.
by jorgemf 9y ago
Swift developers, how is the evolution of the programming language now? does it still have backwards compatibility issues or things are more stable now (and will be with this new proposals)?

More ›