jonathan_gorard

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jonathan_gorard 6y ago

   It's relatively common practice in academia to make announcements about results while they're still in pre-print form (particularly given how slow the peer review process is for some journals).
2. 2.▲
   by jonathan_gorard 6y ago

   They already have, as I said in response to your other version of the same question :)
3. 3.▲
   by jonathan_gorard 6y ago

   Our preprints are currently in peer review (for different journals, I should add). Nothing terrible has happened yet.
4. 4.▲
   by jonathan_gorard 6y ago

   (1) We certainly do have formal derivations of Lorentz covariance and the Einstein field equations, given in detail here: http://wolframcloud.com/obj/wolframphysics/Documents/some-re... (2) The article above
5. 5.▲
   by jonathan_gorard 6y ago

   Cheers!
6. 6.▲
   by jonathan_gorard 6y ago

   With respect, I don't think that our derivation of the conformal structure of spacetime, or of the Einstein field equations in the continuum limit of infinite causal graphs, is "hand-waving". See, for instance: https:/&
7. 7.▲
   by jonathan_gorard 6y ago

   Thanks for your encouraging comments! There is already a proposed observational test for the maximum entanglement rate hypothesis (based on the location of the stretched horizon in the context of black hole physics), proposed here: https:&
8. 8.▲
   by jonathan_gorard 6y ago

   We can prove violation of the CHSH inequality, and hence compatibility with Bell's theorem, as a natural consequence of our formalism. See, for instance: https://www.wolframcloud.com/obj/wolframphysics/Documen
9. 9.▲
   by jonathan_gorard 6y ago

   I sure hope not ;)