Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
johnfn
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
631.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
Dismissing anyone who isn't already aligned with your world view as "just cope" seems an unproductive strategy to having a discussion. If I won 100M, I wouldn't work the exact same job - I'd probably move into an
632.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
It seems like you're trying to tell me that I don't actually enjoy my work? That seems observably untrue from my perspective? If you don't enjoy your work, that's fine, but trying to tell people who do that they actually
633.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
Surely we can have a better discussion on this topic than "everyone who disagrees with me is insane".
634.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
It also doesn't make any sense; it feels as if the overview was written by AI and not double-checked by a human. And you can verify this by scrolling down the page and seeing how the writing quality drops off after the comparison table
635.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
Plenty of people work at large corporations and enjoy their work.
636.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
Ah, so this is what the Sonic model that Cursor had was. I've been doing this personal bench where I ask each model to create a 3D render of a guy using a laptop on a desk. I haven't written up a post to show the different output
637.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
The thing you are doing wrong is asking it to solve hard problems. Claude Code excels at solving fairly easy, but tedious stuff. Refactors that are brainless but take an hour. It will knock those out of the park. Fire up a git worktree and
638.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
> The "real-time" version looks awful, etc Dang man it's just a guy showing off a neat thing he did for fun. This reaction seems excessive.
639.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
Thanks for the explanation! That's a very nice pattern. > I just wish that this was the ONLY way to actually do it I completely agree.
640.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
If you want to be more charitable, you could say "Rust library design is superior to the Web API library design", and I'd say you were right - particularly for crufty stuff like .href which was designed decades ago.
641.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
I'm not as familiar with Rust, but isn't there still a gap? For instance, if we modified window.set_href to have move semantics, wouldn't this still work (i.e. not produce an error)? let win = window.set_href("
642.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
Genuine curiosity: how do you know that software is in a recession? What measures do you use to determine this? And how do you know that the recession is not AI driven? I don't think it is either, but it's more of a feeling; I
643.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
That’s a good point. I actually modified my comment because I assumed everyone would take for granted that no work should be done in a setter :) > A function which never returns to the caller doesn't fit into the overall picture. Hm
644.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
I think Rust is awesome and I agree with that part of the article. What I disagree with is that it's the fault of Typescript that the href assignment bug is not caught. I don't think that has anything to do with Typescript. The bu
645.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
Oh come on - you have this incredible technology at your disposal and all you can think to use it for is product placement?
646.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
This kind of reminds me of `--dangerously-skip-permissions` in Claude Code, and yet look how cavalier we are about that! Perhaps you could extend the idea by sandboxing the browser to have "harmless" cookies but not "harmful&
647.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
> If I google something about suicide, I get an immediate notification telling me that life is worth living, and giving me information about my local suicide prevention hotline. The article says that GPT repeatedly (hundreds of times) pr
648.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
I'm curious which models the OP is using that produce code so quickly and accurately? I mostly use Claude Code, which is accurate, but it isn't very fast. I certainly don't feel like I'm producing piles of code with it.
649.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
What?
650.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
I naively went onto Gemini in order to try to use the new model and had what I could only describe as the worst conversation I've had with an AI since GPT 3.5[1]. Is this really the model that's on top of the leaderboard right now
651.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
Out of curiosity, how come LibreOffice has .buckversion, BUCK, .buckconfig, etc? This commit[1] does seem to indicate using Buck to build at one point, though it is 10 years old. [1]: https://github.com/LibreOffice/core
652.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
Phone calls while driving are pretty clearly in the Overton window of 'safe things you can do in a car', and it doesn't seem a priori obvious to me that this is worse. Though I do agree with you that in an ideal world people
653.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
Jurigged is really cool - thanks for the tool!
654.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
I was definitely stopped from boarding when I arrived to the airport 45 minutes before departure when on Spirit. That was the last time I used Spirit.
655.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
This is clever.
656.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
It's funny you say this in the context of the article, which is effectively 'parenting' smartphone use across all citizens of Toyoake.
657.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
Thanks for breaking that down. I think I would disagree a bit with both. It doesn't seem a priori evident that producing a bus factor of zero is bad. For instance, using a library which is not maintained has a bus factor of zero. That
658.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
I do think this is a problem. But the article goes one step further than claiming it's a problem - it claims that a bus factor of 0, and by extension, vibe coding, is "fundamentally flawed". I don't think that a bus fact
659.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
I think that's moving goalposts. The original post never talks about vibe-coding mission-critical software - and I wouldn't advocate for that, either. The post says that all vibe coding is fundamentally flawed.
660.
▲
by
johnfn
1y ago
This fork has around 20 net-new commits on it. The Zed repository has around 30,000 commits. This is a wee bit premature, no?
More ›