It also doesn't make any sense; it feels as if the overview was written by AI and not double-checked by a human. And you can verify this by scrolling down the p

It also doesn't make any sense; it feels as if the overview was written by AI and not double-checked by a human. And you can verify this by scrolling down the page and seeing how the writing quality drops off after the comparison table. Why is React marked a "No" on incremental adoption? Of course React supports incremental adoption. Is React really a no on lazy loading? There is React.lazy. React "needs" Redux as a third-party dependency? What? It says React needs a build step, but that's not actually true, and the way that Q constructs nodes looks like the way that React constructs nodes without a build step. If the memory usage / performance on SSR/render truly outperforms these other platforms, let's see some benchmarks rather than just saying so.