3 ms·
This kind of reminds me of `--dangerously-skip-permissions` in Claude Code, and yet look how cavalier we are about that! Perhaps you could extend the idea by sa
by johnfn 1y ago
This kind of reminds me of `--dangerously-skip-permissions` in Claude Code, and yet look how cavalier we are about that! Perhaps you could extend the idea by sandboxing the browser to have "harmless" cookies but not "harmful" ones. Hm, maybe that doesn't work, because gmail is harmful, but without gmail, you can't really do anything. Hmm...
- victorbjorklund 1y agoMade me think (never gonna happen but still) maybe we could have different cookies/sessions for the agents and for ourself where the webapp can decide what permissions either can have. For gmail maybe you could allow the agent to read your email but not send email and so on.