joekrill

36 ms·

301.
by joekrill 9y ago
Uhh, yeah, that's actually exactly what it proves. If they have "plans and contingencies" for it then -- by that very fact -- it's been considered! And if you want to get pedantic, they most definitely don't have th
302.
by joekrill 9y ago
"Nutters" will find "proof" regardless of what they've been given. What this _does_ prove is what the US is willing to even _consider_ doing to justify various things it wants to accomplish. So at some point you mus
303.
by joekrill 9y ago
That's an outrageously flawed thought process. Just because it's been that way for a very long time, doesn't mean it's a good thing and that it shouldn't be fixed. By that logic, a child who has been abused their en
304.
by joekrill 9y ago
In pretty much every case minification is going to reduce the payload, which is going to reduce the amount of data a client has to download. Whether you're minifying 1KB down to 100 bytes, or 50 MB down to 3 MB -- you're still ben
305.
by joekrill 9y ago
I think the video was actually pretty clear in that they haven't really figured a lot of stuff out yet, and the funding is to do just that. It was very clear that the funding is for R&D, not for a final product.
306.
by joekrill 9y ago
What in the world does this have to do with the article in question? There isn't a single mention of Javascript in this entire article. Not even in passing. Jeez it's like a contest around here sometimes: who can bash Javascript t
307.
by joekrill 9y ago
Obviously anecdotal, but I've had similar experiences. Granted I haven't really worked with any _other_ bootcamp grads, but we have a handful of junior developers who've attended Flatiron and they're all really great. Th
308.
by joekrill 9y ago
I'm going to go against what appears to be popular opinion and suggest that this reeks of a "back in my day..." complaint. There's always been poorly-written software, poorly-created websites, bad UIs, bad UX, etc. And I
309.
by joekrill 9y ago
Thrive TRM | Senior Software Engineer | Haddonfield, NJ (Philadelphia, PA) | ONSITE | Full Time We're a fast-growing SAAS company looking to add an additional senior engineer to the team. Our core product is used for managing the recru
310.
by joekrill 9y ago
I do it fairly often.
311.
by joekrill 9y ago
I bought a Shield not too long ago and I love it. But the $200 price point didn't make it a simple purchase -- I was reluctant to shell out that cash. I've bought a Chromecast, FireTV, etc, and they all end up being quite a bit of
312.
by joekrill 9y ago
Can someone explain to me Judge Gilstrap's motive for these rulings and funneling cases to his district? Does he take kickbacks from the patent holders? Does it force business into his area? Or maybe he is just an asshole?
313.
by joekrill 9y ago
At this point the surprising headline should be when NFL players are found to NOT have C.T.E. I really don't understand how the NFL is getting away with this so easily. I guess they have good PR? People just like football so much that
314.
by joekrill 9y ago
There's also Little Big Details ( http://littlebigdetails.com/ ) which does something similar.
315.
by joekrill 9y ago
Ah ok I guess I misunderstood your comment. Though, to be honest, I still don't quite understand what you were getting at. :$
316.
by joekrill 9y ago
I'm not sure what you're suggesting. Just because something can be abused for nefarious purposes doesn't mean we should ban it or abandon it. People use cars to kill people -- perhaps we should ban those? People use binocular
317.
by joekrill 9y ago
That line of reasoning could be applied to pretty much every single comment in this thread. Literally. Pick any comment and you could simply respond with: "Well it's not released yet so it's not pertinent". The very fact
318.
by joekrill 9y ago
I wish someone would explain why the licensing issue is not a pertinent discussion here And why those comments have been removed. In any other case that would be a perfectly reasonable point to consider.
319.
by joekrill 9y ago
I don't really see how mindfulness would need anything specific for a particular field / personality type. What is special about being a "hacker" that requires a special approach to mindfulness? If you're trying to
320.
by joekrill 9y ago
Absolutely agree. I used to like to check /r/all for a more rounded view -- but I don't get that anymore. And apparently they're planning to move toward more location-specific view -- which will only make the problem wor
321.
by joekrill 9y ago
Why no input on the page itself for something like that?
322.
by joekrill 9y ago
But none of the links are affiliate links? I mean, I agree that this is far from the best, most comprehensive VPN review site, but you can't just make things up like this.
323.
by joekrill 9y ago
What is unnerving about it exactly? It seems to me that's exactly the type of thing you'd want from a company who focuses on privacy. It gives the appearance that they actually, truly care about privacy and aren't just in it
324.
by joekrill 9y ago
I know you mentioned in your description that this is only in New York so far, but that is not at all clear when visiting the site.
325.
by joekrill 9y ago
I've certainly "fallen victim" to this. I label it as that because -- for me at least -- the determination fades very quickly. Maybe I just have to find enough of these books to read consistently so I can keep my determinism
326.
by joekrill 9y ago
The problem is: who gets to define extremism? It may seem pretty clear cut to you in this particular instance, but it's a slippery slope. In the US, Republicans may want to label Democrats as extremists, and vice versa. We've alre
327.
by joekrill 9y ago
The problem with things like this is that they won't resolve without an internet connection.
328.
by joekrill 9y ago
Comcast has pretty questionable morals, if you ask me.
329.
by joekrill 9y ago
VICE has a good documentary on what this actually looks like: https://video.vice.com/en_us/video/garbage-island/563b9c912a...
330.
by joekrill 9y ago
I believe Reddit's code is open source -- is that still correct? I'd guess this "rewrite" won't be? In any event, I find it hard to believe this won't be Digg all over again.

More ›