4 ms·
What in the world does this have to do with the article in question? There isn't a single mention of Javascript in this entire article. Not even in passing. Jee
by joekrill 9y ago
What in the world does this have to do with the article in question? There isn't a single mention of Javascript in this entire article. Not even in passing. Jeez it's like a contest around here sometimes: who can bash Javascript the most.
- jbreckmckye 9y agoThe article states that Ruby has substantial problems. Many readers will be web developers. The biggest and most lucrative alternative to Ruby in that space is JavaScript. Therefore: lucaspiller decided to remind people that switching to JS is not a good solution to Ruby's problems.
- emodendroket 9y ago> The biggest and most lucrative alternative to Ruby in that space is JavaScript. I wonder about this. C#, Java, Python, PHP, hell, even Scala are all viable options.
- jbreckmckye 9y agoI'll grant that Java / C# might be more lucrative, but I'm doubtful about the others. The main draw to JS is that if you learn it and use it regularly, you can trade as a full-stack developer.
- emodendroket 9y agoScala is pretty well-paying, as far as I can tell. And frankly you don't have to be a JS expert to call yourself a full-stack developer; you just have to be conversant. In my experience, anyway. And from what I've seen front-end is the least well-paying specialty.