jncfhnb

37 ms·

781.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
You buy it on steam though. A tiny fraction of titles are not available on steam. I would 1000% prefer the experience of steam over the App Store. Heck I would prefer the Epic Game Store.
782.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Finish the sentence
783.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
And yet people just use steam and they’re fine.
784.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
The writing is on the wall for Apple either way
785.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
I don’t understand how folks are missing the article with the head crab photo while talking about logos and javascript. > We love the Half Life community. In the last couple of days we've received a ton of messages of support and cu
786.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_wants_to_be_free
787.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
People will still pay you to create things. Posting things in public and hoping to stake a claim on that information is… stupid. We don’t want society to evolve on shitty workarounds like hiring someone to summarize a work so it can be inge
788.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Sounds like information would finally be free, just like it always wanted
789.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Flux is the best base model and you grab small fine tune Loras for specific styles
790.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
It’s not copyright infringement to copy somebody’s style.
791.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
If you drew it shittily from memory it would still be copyright infringement. As would retelling it. Discoverability of the infringement and the irrelevance of the violation is the reason you don’t get sued
792.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
> If they weren't, then why would these companies fight so hard to say otherwise? What kind of looney logic is this?
793.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Imo the game is clearly not intended to be about forced 1:1’s. The majority of the tanks seem to be optimized for just free for alls. For one on ones you’d be pretty dumb not to prioritize front facing guns
794.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
I think it it feels a little clumsy. Movement is very floaty and since everyone moves the same there’s not a lot of opportunity to do anything if a chase begins. You ultimately will get caught. Some sort of boosting would help a lot here.
795.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
For images, nothing. They’re just using an off the shelf model and using their LLM to prompt it.
796.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
You can rent hardware if you really need to and still run the models yourself, but you just need a basic gaming rig more or less
797.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
It’s fully believable that the architecture behind SD3 requires more parameters to perform at the level of 1.5 though. SD3 does genuinely do “better” than 1.5 by many metrics it’s just that it is simultaneously really bad.
798.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
You are conflating big tech companies that run models for you and companies that provide you with models to run. SD whatever doesn’t know what porn is, but it is trivially fine tuned to churn out porn every day.
799.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
I guessed that it was based on the Microsoft logo. Others commenting have found a press release confirming this
800.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
SD3 is not neutered, it’s just much, much smaller than flux. And it’s smaller than SDXL. Model size is king. Imo releasing it was a mistake. People have stirred them into believing conspiracy theories about SD3 when the simplest explanatio
801.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Most of this conversation is just people who don’t know what image generation is doing today. X’s shitty wrapper around Flux is meaningless. Go to civit ai and grab the latest open source fine tune of your choice. You want porn? Great. We h
802.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
For access to a model that is freely available with fewer guardrails. It’s a tool for people who don’t know what they’re doing.
803.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Hah! Sniped. Yeah flux is a great model. It’s very inconsistent about its knowledge about what celebrities look like. Some it knows. Some it does not. Mostly women.
804.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Not many models can produce the Microsoft logo like that. Wonder if it’s just Flux
805.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Your images at the top appear to be very low quality and not related to your images at the bottom. Your girl slider appears to be using an ai generated photorealistic photo base as the woman has a long strand of hair that comes from nowhere
806.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Isn’t this equivalent to just not offering you the smaller, lower spec phone then? Per your decision tree?
807.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
> Completely false. By definition, if you own a plot of land, you have a complete monopoly on that location. Nobody else can compete with the price you put on that slice of the Earth. LAND is defined by its non fungibility. A plot of lan
808.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
It is challenging to obtain informed consent when a company acting as the middleman between you and your customers changes their terms even if it is theoretically possible try and convince your customers to change middlemen.
809.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Weirdly confident and passionate rant here about nonsense. Capital is not defined by non fungibility. Land is not “monopolistic” by nature. Competition can exist for land. Monopolies don’t define free markets. Land is not capital but not be
810.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Donating to small indie artists is philanthropic and should warrant “feels”. Patreon does not use the word donate, but they do consider contributions to by “donations” even under recommended tax policy if the artist happens to be a non prof

More ›