3 ms·
Most of this conversation is just people who don’t know what image generation is doing today. X’s shitty wrapper around Flux is meaningless. Go to civit ai and
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Most of this conversation is just people who don’t know what image generation is doing today. X’s shitty wrapper around Flux is meaningless.
Go to civit ai and grab the latest open source fine tune of your choice. You want porn? Great. We have “Boobs and More”, “face sitting”, “flux topless” and “improved female nudity”. These are looking at just the models updated in the past 24h and just for flux.
Having a big tech giant act as a middleman for you is just weird. Who gives a shit about their particular guardrails?
- nickthegreek 2y agoThis article didn't mention they were using flux under the hood. Do you have a link to that? It makes sense to do that.
- jncfhnb 2y agoI guessed that it was based on the Microsoft logo. Others commenting have found a press release confirming this
- nickthegreek 2y agoVerge states it in their other article. https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/14/24220127/grok-ai-chatbot-beta-image-generation-x-xai-update https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/14/24220127/grok-ai-chatbot-... > Grok’s prompt-based image maker is powered by Black Forest Lab’s Flux 1 AI model, and allows users to generate and publish images directly to the X social platform — with seemingly few guardrails in place to prevent abuse.
- GaryNumanVevo 2y agoThen what is xAI doing? Any published papers or anything?
- jncfhnb 2y agoFor images, nothing. They’re just using an off the shelf model and using their LLM to prompt it.
- Deepen5 2y ago[dead]