jmye

10 ms·

151.
by jmye 6mo ago
> Still, hamburgers and milkshakes don’t give you heart disease and cancer. Overeating, oxidative stress from low-quality ingredients, etc might. What? “Oxidative stress”? Oh come on, at least go full “seed oil” if we’re going to talk no
152.
by jmye 6mo ago
> Drugs risks do not enter into the picture given the fact I can buy ammonia and bleach along with a myriad of other dangerous compounds. This is a deeply weird take. You think anyone ought to be able to buy, for instance, warfarin and f
153.
by jmye 6mo ago
> Another point I could raise is that telemedicine has turned the entire prescription system into nothing more than a parasitic middleman/gatekeeper. I’m curious what you mean by this. I’m not sure what you mean by “prescription sys
154.
by jmye 6mo ago
> Punch up dude. No, thanks, though. Mark Zuckerberg doesn't care if everyone on the planet thinks he's a dick. But as long as folks like you will go to the ends of the earth to make excuses for anyone who's complicit in t
155.
by jmye 6mo ago
I just don't get this post. I connect with people, and I've never needed Meta products to do it. I have friends, and I've never needed Meta products to do it. You're not describing needs, your describing a specific a
156.
by jmye 6mo ago
> Plenty of republicans are vociferously disagreeing with Trump over Iran and Epstein. Until they have to take a meaningful vote. Because it’s bullshit.
157.
by jmye 6mo ago
> the majority of the US population agree with some of the ideas behind Trump And will happily vote for it again and again, provided the better next to the name is an R, no matter how they answer approval polls. This is what happens when
158.
by jmye 6mo ago
> Do you commonly carry those around with you? I do when I’m going somewhere that doesn’t allow phones. How is this complicated or hard to understand?
159.
by jmye 6mo ago
Then don’t go. No idea what the issue is, here.
160.
by jmye 6mo ago
> To everyone who voted for Trump ... YOU VOTED FOR THIS. THANKS. This conflict was obvious and inevitable (and called out by literally anyone with half a brain) and exactly what every single one of them voted for. Don’t ever let them pr
161.
by jmye 6mo ago
> Nobody has to proof anything. It can give your claim credibility “I don’t need to provide proof to say things” is a valueless, trivial assertion that adds no value whatsoever to any discussion anyone has ever had. If you want to preten
162.
by jmye 7mo ago
> Nobody voted for Meta. Of course they did - they “voted” for them every time they signed on to Facebook or Instagram or used WhatsApp, and they doubled down every time they let their children use them. They vote for them every time the
163.
by jmye 7mo ago
> I think it's becoming a trap to hold the author up as a hero Cool, then don’t do that. Every single employee at Meta is still vile and making the world a worse place every single day, and anything exposing the depths of their sh
164.
by jmye 7mo ago
Would be wonderful if we could leave the blatantly transparent, false equivalencies on Facebook and Twitter where they’re more becoming of the general user base, and maybe try to be slightly more thoughtful, eh?
165.
by jmye 7mo ago
What do you think “welfare state” means? Do you think “European-style” salaries solely occur because “European-style” people, for instance, have a different healthcare system?
166.
by jmye 7mo ago
Ahh, I understand what you're saying. I guess I wonder if he cares about control of Congress, given the SC ruling in Trump V United States? > apparently over a promotions list Not at all surprising.
167.
by jmye 7mo ago
> is there a reason to bring in a company that hires people at and above our level of competence Is there no one in the UK with any competence? > who have the expertise to implement a system to bring the NHS out of the dark ages of I
168.
by jmye 7mo ago
I’m not following. Are you suggesting that Hegseth, maybe the second dumbest person to ever hold a cabinet position, is plotting a coup? I also don’t follow how getting rid of “disloyal people” (given prior patterns, not as a comment on the
169.
by jmye 7mo ago
Ahh, thanks
170.
by jmye 7mo ago
> But it's not like the P/E should be 30 ... Why not? Aside from memes, I mean.
171.
by jmye 7mo ago
Even if you think those are standard numbers and you're banking on growth, or whatever, I don't see any way anyone rational (or even a semi-rational AI bull) could convince themselves xAI isn't an absolute garbage company.
172.
by jmye 7mo ago
> Unfortunately, shorting it means betting that space data centers won’t happen (I’d happily take that bet) This seems like an easy bet to win, though I don't know what you were responding to now that it's flagged. It's ha
173.
by jmye 7mo ago
Meme it till it's true, I guess? People are nuts.
174.
by jmye 7mo ago
> Of course this comment will be downvoted by Anthropic's paid PR machine, because there's no way actual users who have tried both products would be so in favor of Claude. Sure, it couldn't possibly be that others have had
175.
by jmye 7mo ago
Literally every part of this comment is confusing. Elon hasn't shown anyone anything interesting in at least a decade. OpenAI hasn't forced Apple to do anything - LLMs aren't impinging on hardware or bundled services, and thi
176.
by jmye 7mo ago
Is that true? Not arguing, just curious. I would imagine that the highly valuable users are those most likely to buy things, and people that into privacy would be fundamentally more likely to also go to extremes to block that advertising, b
177.
by jmye 7mo ago
Your comment has real "a man wears a schoolgirl outfit and a woman wears a schoolgirl outfit, but society doesn't like one - checkmate feminists" logic to it. The idea you'd start with comparing porn to a book says enoug
178.
by jmye 7mo ago
I want to be really clear that I'm not trying to argue with your experience, just to understand it... but: > However even then, I'd rather have an app for them where I can enter in the items I want to order. Really? You want to
179.
by jmye 7mo ago
> Legally that amounts "hearsay" and cannot have any value. Those statements probably won't even be admissible in court without other supporting facts entered in first. I just want to understand your argument: you believe
180.
by jmye 7mo ago
I was going to respond, because of course the site has value if that’s where my network is and that’s where everyone posts jobs. But I don’t think that’s what you’re asking. I frankly have no idea who uses the social media aspects of the si

More ›