jmye

10 ms·

181.
by jmye 7mo ago
> If it's not cost effective but you want it anyway, you can explicitly subsidize it instead of mandating it. Or, as happened in actual reality, you tell the owners they have to put it in place. Imagine that - the two weirdly specif
182.
by jmye 7mo ago
Ahh, good, parsing words. I can tell you have a lot of useful and interesting things to say. So tired of people trying to pass off pseudointellectual pedanticism as useful or additive insight.
183.
by jmye 7mo ago
My position is that they differentially collect data and that their version of that data collection is worse . It's almost like that's way I've been talking solely about that for the entire thread, in spite of your attempt
184.
by jmye 7mo ago
> It's definitely not cool to have a school adjacent to a military base. Not saying this specific attack was justified I mean, you kind of are saying it was justified, given the entirety of your focus is on justifying it. The bloo
185.
by jmye 7mo ago
> This was a choice to use children as human shields Perhaps we should have, you know, just not bombed that particular fucking site until the end of the fucking school day if it was such a vital target. God forbid we act like a vaguely i
186.
by jmye 7mo ago
Does that make it not a school, somehow? Or are we cool with killing kids just because their parents might be in the military? I'm not clear what the excuse being made actually is.
187.
by jmye 7mo ago
> "virtual signaling" which specifically means a "moral" which causes more harm than good Literally not what that means, at all. What a ridiculous assertion.
188.
by jmye 7mo ago
If they got a job at one of those companies, they could've gotten a job elsewhere. It's a specific choice, and "but I'm only 25, how could I possibly be expected to know right from wrong" isn't really an excuse
189.
by jmye 7mo ago
With you on the DH, but the pitch clock has almost made baseball watchable again.
190.
by jmye 7mo ago
> They'd rather lose the election than let women compete against females only. Fascinating political analysis. It's weird how a small group of people are deeply driven by identity politics above literally anything else, espec
191.
by jmye 7mo ago
A family making 40k a year qualifies for significant benefits and subsidies, even today. But don't let not knowing what you're talking about stop you from angrily talking about it.
192.
by jmye 7mo ago
You were working at a FAANG and had the enhanced subsidies? That strikes me as complete bullshit and non sequitur to the post. ACA plans and LG/SG plans are not the same, and pretending they are is, frankly, a large part of why healthc
193.
by jmye 7mo ago
> The "ad business" canard is (and always was) a distraction. Your position is that Google has not and does not differentially acquire data on its users (and non-users) because... Apple has shared some data with the feds? Is th
194.
by jmye 7mo ago
> _That_ is what you do not understand. My man, you are arguing with someone who fucking understands that. I get you think America is entirely dudes coal-rolling their pickup trucks in Bumfuck Texas because you're angry and you wa
195.
by jmye 7mo ago
I trust a business to do it's business - I don't believe Apple is going to try to build a massive database of everything I do online, because that is not its business. I do believe Google has a vested interest in knowing everythin
196.
by jmye 7mo ago
> Sorry, but I don't think they do understand. Sorry, but 1/3 of the country is deeply, keenly aware of what an absolute fucking disgrace the last year and two months have been for us on an international stage. There's no
197.
by jmye 7mo ago
> It has to be hard for Americans to realise that their government has pissed so much of the world off so badly. It is not hard, at all, for roughly 1/3 of Americans to understand this. Another 1/3 don't think it, or anyth
198.
by jmye 7mo ago
The credit score line is just about the stupidest thing I've read in a long time. Some people desperately need to get off mainstream social media.
199.
by jmye 7mo ago
Currently, one is a surveillance company that is motivated to abuse my privacy in every possible way, in order to target ads (and, conceivably, Gemini). The other, currently, is a hardware company that's dipped it's toes in advert
200.
by jmye 7mo ago
Internet memes and terminal Holy Wars take nearly zero thought, effort or intelligence to post about. Just emotion and hot takes, and you're almost guaranteed a response.
201.
by jmye 7mo ago
> We’re already there. Your individual labor isn’t enough to make a living unless you subscribe to the altar of a feudal FAANG. This is preposterous. You think you already can't "make a living" without working at a FAANG
202.
by jmye 7mo ago
Then people should stop being dumbfucks and engage in local (which are frequently non-partisan) and state elections and primaries, and stop pretending that "the president didn't fix everything and make this a socialist utopia, so
203.
by jmye 7mo ago
My man, you said "If you look at what has been achieved versus what was achieved in the same time period in the previous Gulf wars ... " - I responded directly to that, saying it was a stupid measuring stick. If you wanted to sa
204.
by jmye 7mo ago
> But in AI a single person created OpenClaw. Do you think no one can create anything alone ever again? Or can they only do it by adopting the bleeding edge? > It's called low-hanging fruits. 1 in a million ideas are 1 in a milli
205.
by jmye 7mo ago
> Actually, it's really striking that even in America -- the developed country with the #1 highest birthrate -- still falls below the replacement rate. What is it that's inversely correlated between growing wealth and having ch
206.
by jmye 7mo ago
> Hope you don't get there too late. Too late for what ? Could no one start a viable internet business in 2005, or were they all taken in 1998? Is it impossible to learn machine learning today, if you weren't jumping into Tens
207.
by jmye 7mo ago
The argument about bitcoin was against it being "the future of currency". There is no point, whatsoever, to "getting in early" to that. If everyone had been talking about it like the casino that it actually is, then sure
208.
by jmye 7mo ago
People don't believe in that anymore. If your gut instinct was wrong, you're not only bound to it for all time, but you'd best angrily double down at every opportunity. God forbid you "flip flop" or consider new inf
209.
by jmye 7mo ago
Was "when it first came out" a confusing limiter, there? I guess it seems like the article was making the point that jumping on git the day it came out could've just meant learning the betamax of repos, and that it was better
210.
by jmye 7mo ago
> leveraging their networks Just finished a search - agree. The resume process is fundamentally broken, but a strong network makes it irrelevant. Lean on connections - there's a ton of opportunity out there.

More ›