Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jimkleiber
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
jimkleiber
6mo ago
Fair on not knowing what you'll get out of someone. But if that varies wildly, I may not want to hire that person. Even with employment, predictability matters a lot. If they underperform too much, I might feel annoyed. If they overper
62.
▲
by
jimkleiber
6mo ago
I just want a little predictable insight into how much I get. For example, at a buffet, I know I can only eat so much food and can plan around it. This is like going to a buffet and not knowing how many plates I can take or how big the plat
63.
▲
by
jimkleiber
6mo ago
I looked at my cc usage and I was at 90% of my weekly allowance after 3 days of use...BUT, if I looked at the usage stats with the chart, it showed, on a scale of 1-4 intensity of usage (4 being most intense), the three days as such: Day 1:
64.
▲
by
jimkleiber
6mo ago
Oh I didn't mean to say that's what you wanted it to mean, just that I've heard clean cut in two main spaces: taking off bandages and slaughtering animals. If you mean clean cut as in only cleanly cut the contract, but then m
65.
▲
by
jimkleiber
6mo ago
Yeah that makes sense to me and I appreciate you saying it. If the whole team gets laid off, it's we all go down with the ship. But if one person gets laid off on a team, I think it can create intense dynamics. Like why them specifical
66.
▲
by
jimkleiber
6mo ago
It sounds as if you're describing how to humanely kill a living being. There are alternatives to killing things and I don't think fast clean cut is true in all industries. I think people want it to be true because then it hides aw
67.
▲
by
jimkleiber
6mo ago
And that includes them, the people doing the layoffs, who are employees as well. And what we often don't realize is that causing the pain to others most often causes pain to us as well. Human group output and productivity can rely a lo
68.
▲
by
jimkleiber
6mo ago
Eh, that's brutal, wondering why someone isn't replying to your email only to find out they get let go. Almost like finding out a friend died, in a professional way. I think we often just don't understand the full dimensional
69.
▲
by
jimkleiber
6mo ago
Maybe the solution is to not do mass layoffs. Not sure there's a dignified way to let go of many humans at the same time with almost no reason for why they're being let go except maybe a vague profitability scorecard. And also to
70.
▲
by
jimkleiber
6mo ago
Yeah, our litigation culture to me is just an inability for individuals/companies to resolve conflicts and escalate it to the legal system. And unfortunately there are many elements in the system that discourage us from reconciling and
71.
▲
by
jimkleiber
6mo ago
I'm not sure if companies understand the emotional impact on the laid off and the layoff survivors. It almost seems like a terror campaign, whether intended or not.
72.
▲
by
jimkleiber
7mo ago
I had struggled so much to measure text and number of lines when creating dynamic subtitles for remotion videos, not sure if it was my incompetence or a complexity with the DOM itself. I feel hopeful this will make it much easier :-)
73.
▲
by
jimkleiber
7mo ago
I think when we say that an executive is the only one to put an end to another executive in power, we overlook how the problem might be that the parties have deadlocked Congress and the legislative branch is one to take power back from the
74.
▲
by
jimkleiber
7mo ago
I had no idea they actually changed the domain name. Reminds me of Musk wanting it to be X because it sounded tougher. Something about trying to appear tough seems to make me think those people are less tough. I'm sure there's som
75.
▲
by
jimkleiber
7mo ago
Got an error on Level 17, just a heads up. Love the game, btw.
76.
▲
by
jimkleiber
7mo ago
There was a South Park episode about this years ago where everyone was trying to get it from Tom Brady.
77.
▲
by
jimkleiber
7mo ago
Perhaps for people who have large sums of money, they don't tend to play in high risk bets anyways, they don't need to. Large sums make large sums on small percentage movement. Most people don't have enough money to make larg
78.
▲
by
jimkleiber
7mo ago
Banks are about saving money and reducing risk. Arguably when they got into high risk investments to make high reward is what contributed to the 2008 recession. Not sure if banks are the best example of proving the country is not headed tow
79.
▲
by
jimkleiber
7mo ago
Well markets give a huge financial incentive for it. Before you had to get paid a bribe for an intelligence agent. Now you can just "legitimately" bet on a market. It's a LOT easier and more spread out, I imagine.
80.
▲
by
jimkleiber
7mo ago
Yeah but less direct incentive than "If my friends (and I) bet money on X, and I do X, they (and I) make money."
81.
▲
by
jimkleiber
8mo ago
In 2020 at the start of covid, I did an experiment I called Project 35 where, for 35 days straight before my 35th birthday, I wrote 3 times per day, for 10 minutes each, I livestreamed it and whatever I wrote I would put directly into a boo
82.
▲
by
jimkleiber
9mo ago
How well does such llm research hold up as new models are released?
83.
▲
by
jimkleiber
9mo ago
Probably depends how you're using it. I've been able to modify open-source software in languages I've never dreamed of learning, so for that, it's MUCH faster. Seems like a power tool, which, like a power saw, can do a l
84.
▲
by
jimkleiber
9mo ago
You articulated it: "They're gonna take MY ___ away!" It's not about taking guns or free speech, it's about taking THEIR guns or free speech. I don't think they're bad people, just think sometimes we human
85.
▲
by
jimkleiber
9mo ago
You mean like apartments/condos in Trump Tower? Ha. I wonder if banning them from buying SFHs actually decreases the supply of SFHs and shifts people to build more, guess what, apartments/condos that Trump can put his name on and
86.
▲
by
jimkleiber
9mo ago
I was surprised how impressed I was by the website. The layout, design, focus on simple foods. I think the person above may just feel skeptical of the scientific and medical opinion of most of the people running the US government. I know I
87.
▲
by
jimkleiber
9mo ago
If heroin were legal, in my current phase of life, I don't think I'd take it. I don't like even being drunk, and alcohol is very legal in most places I've lived. But I dunno, I tend to say we should make it harder to get
88.
▲
by
jimkleiber
9mo ago
Perhaps, if our main goal is to simply reduce consumption of a specific drug. The problem I see is that problem avoidance finds other paths. Get rid of heroine? People will use marijuana. Marijuana gone? People use alcohol. Alcohol gone? Pe
89.
▲
by
jimkleiber
9mo ago
there are many people who believe that punishment creates fear and fear creates compliance and compliance solves problems. So if someone in America believes this, then they probably think this will punish people for trafficking drugs (or di
90.
▲
by
jimkleiber
9mo ago
Especially for the supposed capturing of a foreign leader. But maybe we did this with Gaddafi and Hussein, not sure what Congressional approval there was for those either. Apparently H.W. Bush also ordered the capture of Noriega for drug tr
More ›