jheriko

12 ms·

91.
by jheriko 3y ago
there are absolutely tons of better versions than this - although gutenberg is interesting, most of the content is ridiculously obsolete
92.
by jheriko 3y ago
there are some nice examples here showing how to overlap the headers and a few other tricks. https://github.com/rcx/tinyPE
93.
by jheriko 3y ago
amazing how massive they made it with so little functionality classic shitware
94.
by jheriko 3y ago
24 minutes is a better target, i have a few repos like this... and long before the internet made it easy, it was the kind of thing i would do in my lunchtime at an office job. it was way more instructive than following the standard path. in
95.
by jheriko 3y ago
could have made a language faster than C in 0.1x the amount of time
96.
by jheriko 3y ago
meanwhile in the minds of ZeroMQ devs...
97.
by jheriko 3y ago
don't ask for forgiveness, or permission. take your lunch time to send an e-mail that makes it inevitable.
98.
by jheriko 3y ago
his small print is bad, and he should feel bad. (its not, but its an annoying rookie fail)
99.
by jheriko 3y ago
does it work if you flip any random bit though? no.
100.
by jheriko 3y ago
runaway stars suggest that interactions occur leaving binaries behind in these kinds of configurations. i see no need for unphysical fine-tuning. looking at the paper they cite as reference for this claim, those authors thought exactly the
101.
by jheriko 3y ago
some game developers do want to do this. i've gone out of my way in the past, even as a junior, to make efforts in offices to encourage developers to play their own game, and preferably with audio on and for more than 2 seconds at a ti
102.
by jheriko 3y ago
its interesting, but given the quality issues with this sort of tech, i can see it lowering the bar for games even further. can you imagine trying to QA this? in any case... getting this to go anywhere /for anyone else/ imo would
103.
by jheriko 3y ago
i dont get it. they tried an architecture, then couldn't be bothered to describe it well... i remain disappointed at the staggering low quality of academic work. the writing here is appalling. no worked example provided, despite of evi
104.
by jheriko 3y ago
it just gave me clippy... OED will surely change its mind if it hasn't already given the pivotal role this term played during the early computer era. > a person who talks quickly and impishly; an effeminate jerk "his talk reall
105.
by jheriko 3y ago
i lament the world in which this is given weight, not the world where ai is a day-to-day tool.
106.
by jheriko 4y ago
this locks you into the compiler. i used to do "cute" tricks like this. then i learned better. always write the least mysterious code unless you have a good reason...
107.
by jheriko 4y ago
just make a compiler. same result, less time, more learning. yes you should be able to "just do it" nothing involved is hard, everything i needed i had by age 14 in the 1990s without the internet. this means you have it too.
108.
by jheriko 4y ago
One common sign our industry is a sea of wasters...
109.
by jheriko 4y ago
"shit you did in your bedroom as a kid before the internet, in a few hours, done in a weekend with enormous resources!" you people suck.
110.
by jheriko 4y ago
> Feeling smart? Lets change that. No. No you did not. Thanks for reminding me why academia is a wasteland.
111.
by jheriko 4y ago
is it that they are older? isn't this just a fallout from "mutations are random over time"?
112.
by jheriko 4y ago
start making a games. a good demo is what got me in. unity and unreal are ubiquitous and easy to use, if impossible to master. having some demonstrable experience with both will open up a lot of options, as well as give you and the intervie
113.
by jheriko 4y ago
well its true. this is just an article about what a terrible and over privileged person the author is.
114.
by jheriko 4y ago
yeah, the rule that "its fine if there is a known workaround" is not exactly user friendly.
115.
by jheriko 4y ago
i can't even read this. what trash.
116.
by jheriko 4y ago
i never bother capitalising things. i was pulled up on it once, ever. that person was wrong. :P
117.
by jheriko 4y ago
the us is fairly unique in the rate it accepts common mistakes into the language. its part of how they diverged from the standard english used in the rest of the world so quickly...
118.
by jheriko 4y ago
use the code blocks? even messenger supports the backticks and triple backticks now
119.
by jheriko 4y ago
tax
120.
by jheriko 4y ago
reminds me of doing this in excel in 1998 ... although i did a wireframe with bresenham, and struggled to exceed 15fps

More ›