3 ms·
i dont get it. they tried an architecture, then couldn't be bothered to describe it well... i remain disappointed at the staggering low quality of academic wor
by jheriko 3y ago
i dont get it. they tried an architecture, then couldn't be bothered to describe it well...
i remain disappointed at the staggering low quality of academic work. the writing here is appalling. no worked example provided, despite of evidence of one... typical academic crap.
wouldn't surprise me if you go to try it and its wrong, and none of the real problems have been solved.
- _diyar 3y agoI do not understand what exactly you are complaining about. It is true that the "Attention Is All You Need"[0] paper requires some level of basic understanding/experience of ML architectures and engineering, but the target audience for the paper certainly understands it. It would be unnecessary if every academic paper startet with a first principles explanation of what is considered common knowledge in the field. > wouldn't surprise me if you go to try it and its wrong, and none of the real problems have been solved But obviously attention based transformer architectures are solving real world problems (by being better than previous architectures in real world applications). [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762 https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762