jesdjkeujjuju

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jesdjkeujjuju 8y ago

   Good that it is absolutely not an one-sided article, favoring the viewpoint of the union exclusively. Garnered with some anecdotes of somebody having had an accident on the job once, or people sometimes not having assignments, to make it al
2. 2.▲
   by jesdjkeujjuju 8y ago

   I think it probably went like this: a new feature (hard shells) was discovered by evolution, which gave so much advantage that all sorts of varieties could coexist for a while (even sub-optimal ones, as they still had the advantage over old
3. 3.▲
   by jesdjkeujjuju 8y ago

   OK, but explicit in what sense? Does it have to refer to the GDPR, as in "I agree my dta will be stored according to GDPR"? I must admit I have trouble understanding it - how could anybody sign up anywhere without data being store
4. 4.▲
   by jesdjkeujjuju 8y ago

   Sure, not saying you can't use Google Analytics, just that my choice is to remove it.
5. 5.▲
   by jesdjkeujjuju 8y ago

   I think it can simply be GDPR compliant if you inform your users that you are saving that data in your database, and they give you the explicit OK to do to. Explicit consent meaning they tick a checkbox saying "I understand that page x
6. 6.▲
   by jesdjkeujjuju 8y ago

   Personally, I'll activate anonymization of ip addresses in my logs coming next week. There are various solutions for that available. I think you can also log the ip, you just have to get your user's explicit consent. I will also r