4 ms·
I think it probably went like this: a new feature (hard shells) was discovered by evolution, which gave so much advantage that all sorts of varieties could coex
by jesdjkeujjuju 8y ago
I think it probably went like this: a new feature (hard shells) was discovered by evolution, which gave so much advantage that all sorts of varieties could coexist for a while (even sub-optimal ones, as they still had the advantage over old organisms). Eventually, some winners among the organisms emerge, the advantage disappears and the sub-optimal variations begin to die out.
I like to compare it to the evolution of computer games. When they became viable first (home computer revolution), an incredible amount of games was developed. Eventually doom arrived on the scene and every game became a 1st person shooter. (Simplified story, of course). Or the dot com boom maybe - for a while, money was thrown at everything internet related. After a while some winning concepts emerged, and most of the contenders went away again.
- rwnspace 8y agoFor video-game inspired animal biology/evolution, Tierzoo brings fresh insights with each new video: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHsRtomD4twRf5WVHHk-cMw https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHsRtomD4twRf5WVHHk-cMw
- ufo 8y agoOne thing to keep in mind is that hard shells are much better at producing fossils. We don't have as good of an idea of how animals looked before the Cambrian or how diverse they were because most of them did not fossilize very well.
- douglaswlance 8y agoPredation evolved soon before the explosion. That was the FPS of the era.