jb775

17 ms·

121.
by jb775 5y ago
I agree but honestly I'm used to it on HN. This place is a lot of smart people but also the type of people that suffer from severe cognitive dissonance and stubbornness. They are the types that would ridicule Christopher Columbus for e
122.
by jb775 5y ago
My Occam's Razor: NFTs are tax avoidance and/or bribe money vehicles that happen to be attracting useful idiots. They are perfect because: 1) an unlimited number of them can be created quickly and easily 2) "artwork" val
123.
by jb775 5y ago
If you dare to venture, need to follow deep rabbit holes. Look into: work of Harold Aspden (and his coworkers & previous research partners), plancks equation origins and drop offs, dewey larson physics, piesel electric effect origin
124.
by jb775 5y ago
No I mean all world banks have a presence in NYC bc it's the finance capital of the world. NY Times in reality is a shill shop who caters to big money and in-vogue politics. Russia's not as bad as the media makes them out to be.
125.
by jb775 5y ago
IMO you grossly overestimate the amount humans know about things. Science is basically a stream of updated realizations that the previous "known" things were actually wrong.
126.
by jb775 5y ago
But that "something" keeps being pulled down until it is stopped/blocked by something (e.g. the ground). Gravity is perpetual relative to the source of the gravity. It's just that our surroundings change and give the i
127.
by jb775 5y ago
The NYT is mostly shills and this is a perfect example...puts out an article discrediting the whistleblower rather than frame the negativity towards the big corrupt bank with lots of NYC connections. And now you use the shill hit piece as a
128.
by jb775 5y ago
It's crazy how little we understand about gravity if you think about it. It's a perpetual energy source right in front of us, but we never really think about it, and can barely offer a basic explanation as to what powers it. It ev
129.
by jb775 5y ago
Look how hard you're trying to ignore and twist facts to mold them to what you want to believe. It's literally astonishing to see. Look up what cognitive dissonance is. You're experiencing a serious case of this here. I&#x2
130.
by jb775 5y ago
He literally presented all facts and hard evidence, but your brain somehow rejected all that, offered no response to anything he presented, and instead came up with this completely unintelligent response. You should seriously reanalyze how
131.
by jb775 5y ago
That doesn't really apply when theres a bunch of dick pics on an ACTUAL COMPUTER EVERYONE REFUSES TO LOOK AT. Jesus just check the saved wifi network passwords....if Hunter Biden's house network is saved on it, safe to say it&#x27
132.
by jb775 5y ago
Zero verification minus the dozens of Hunter Biden dick pics and pics of him around drugs or whatever. Could easily scrape metadata to figure out if it was def his laptop or not. Macs send data to their servers whenever an application is op
133.
by jb775 5y ago
I'd say smart is what you have naturally, education is what you acquire in school, intelligence is a snapshot of what you actively remember from education plus what you've learned via recent experience, and wisdom is a scratchpad
134.
by jb775 5y ago
I'm also curious how people actually go about purchasing domains immediately after expiring. Like for example when Trump bought jebbush.com during primary season because it happened to expire then (and he temporarily re-routed it to hi
135.
by jb775 5y ago
Hopefully this makes it to a discovery phase where google is forced to reveal the baked in censorship params.
136.
by jb775 5y ago
No, "armed" means having a firearm on your person. You wouldn't get charged with "Armed Bank Robbery" if you walked into a bank wielding a flagpole.
137.
by jb775 5y ago
Completely agree. "Prestigious" American newspapers do so much selective coverage it's insane...most people have absolutely no idea the extent of it. It produces the result of censorship without needing to actually censor. Ju
138.
by jb775 5y ago
What a joke considering the damage is already done. Big tech coordinated to censor a major communication channel based on politics they didn't like.....during a presidential election season. This should be used as ammunition to break u
139.
by jb775 5y ago
You're an idiot
140.
by jb775 5y ago
I noticed during the election that whenever I glanced at the fb "watch" video section, it was videos of guys getting into fist fights, or videos containing disturbing violence. I don't ever watch or search for videos like thi
141.
by jb775 5y ago
What he able to monetize the site at all? Didn't see anything in the article besides him posting a few links that increased certain book sales. If he managed to get a penny for each viewer, he would have made $700k. If not, I'm cu
142.
by jb775 5y ago
Ok maybe I should have said my description is the ideal scenario in the eyes of SPAC creators. Obviously not every one will have a 4x price surge, and not every one will completely tank. There's a reason why they try to attach celebr
143.
by jb775 5y ago
That isn't a realistic representation. SPACs usually start at $10 when formed, then shoot up at least 4x on announcements and hype, the early investors (i.e. people like Chamath) cash out at the peak, then the stock price tanks to $15.
144.
by jb775 5y ago
Building your products around an Apple product is like building a product around a parasite. They'll wait until you depend on Apple hardware, or until they trap your users within their own user-base ecosystem, then will casually demand
145.
by jb775 5y ago
Sounds like Apple is trying to leech off the success of any company making money off Apple product owners.
146.
by jb775 5y ago
> just look it up. They did all of these things and more Can you provide a single example with a source that proves this? And please provide an example of how he "undermined democracy". Sounds like you watch a lot of CNN. I agr
147.
by jb775 5y ago
Can you provide any sources for your claims that prove Trump administration personnel directly profited off any supposed self dealings? Or are you just pulling this out of your ass bc you are a lib? Also, who else specifically do you "
148.
by jb775 5y ago
I'm pretty sure they can't be charged with insider trading for some loophole reason. It's 100% insider trading though. US politicians and their families shouldn't be allowed to buy/sell any stocks as a condition of
149.
by jb775 5y ago
Not a popular opinion here but selectively covering up research is a play straight out of the Communist Manifesto. This sounds more like concerns over the spread of hacking intel, but it's worth noting yet another example given big tec
150.
by jb775 5y ago
I wonder if they could somehow collect interest off it anonymously. I read about certain coins offering staking, but not sure how it works and if it's possible to collect interest without revealing your identity.

More ›