jayliew

16 ms·

31.
by jayliew 7y ago
You realize that there are countries that are in complete lockdown, right? These are not normal, but very serious times. If all a country had to do was pay for the use of 3 full 747s, for a mere 12 hour flight, to get a solution to save cou
32.
by jayliew 7y ago
If you pay close attention, you actually didn't refute my logic at all but called it "garbage" and "false". Ok man, you need to learn how to think through stuff and come back when you're ready.
33.
by jayliew 7y ago
Flight here is 12 hours. So you don't think it's possible? Why?
34.
by jayliew 7y ago
And it's BS for you to blindly claim it that doesn't. Thanks for your "opinion"
35.
by jayliew 7y ago
Thanks for sharing your story. It's rough for immigrants and I can certainly sympathize. I've seen the news of extremely racist things done to Asians in America due to this virus. Let's unpack what you said here: "you&#x
36.
by jayliew 7y ago
A flight is 12 hours. Considering it's a highly urgent need for a very unique circumstance... we're not shipping, IDK, keychains or something.
37.
by jayliew 7y ago
You realize that you're the racist here for pulling the race card, right? I'm not on your side just because you're Asian. I'm interested in the general well being of ALL people, Asian or not, in the US. I'm sorry yo
38.
by jayliew 7y ago
Look up my other comment. Research right now says 3 days.
39.
by jayliew 7y ago
Umm, I don't know how badly you're getting treated, but I haven't been so .. thanks for that "advice"?
40.
by jayliew 7y ago
Ok, so then you agree they need to be tested, we just disagree on how quantitatively extensive it needs to be. So you tell me then, what percentage of these 1M masks do we test? Do we test 1% of it and say they're safe to use, or do we
41.
by jayliew 7y ago
So if you notice, you literally defended someone's "cmmon man" argument as NOT a waste of everyone's time. How about you think about this, for a second, hmm? Studies as of now suggest that the virus can last for 3 days o
42.
by jayliew 7y ago
I've said it repeatedly, but I'll say it again. Here's the logic for you to refute. 1. Mask / test kit made in China. 2. Presumably, it came in contact with the hands of the people making it, in China. 3. If any of those
43.
by jayliew 7y ago
You put words in my mouth. My concern isn't that it's not "good quality". My concern is, the thing is literally coming from the country where the virus originated from to begin with. Presumably, these things were made wi
44.
by jayliew 7y ago
So, if you do the thing you suggested yourself, and NOT infer an assumption of a geopolitically motivated act coming from me, you will see that my logic as stated in point 1 and 2 is actually pragmatic and logical. Assume no malicious inten
45.
by jayliew 7y ago
I don't care about "some spec". I want to know how this product, that is coming from China, isn't already tainted with the virus itself. Your refutation to my logic is "cmmon man" ? It would lead to what action
46.
by jayliew 7y ago
I'd argue that that is better. Because if you're not tested, you know that you don't know. But if you get a false-negative (the test tells you're not infected, but you actually are), you think you're not infected,
47.
by jayliew 7y ago
And what if the mask itself is already tainted with the virus? Wouldn't you want to verify that it's actually free of the virus in the first place? It is coming from China.
48.
by jayliew 7y ago
My logic (point 1 and 2) is a joke? What part about it do you not believe?
49.
by jayliew 7y ago
So if you get a negative result from the test-kit, you let the person go, then later after the fact, you realize that it's a false-negative and you shouldn't have let the patient go ... now you've just spread the virus even
50.
Harvard Department Chair, 1 researcher & 1 student charged for aiding China(justice.gov)
3 points by jayliew 7y ago|0 comments
51.
by jayliew 7y ago
So in my original question, I was inquiring what people were actually doing to positively impact the world in the direction they want it to go (preferably, objectively measurable results), because I know everyone here has opinions about wha
52.
by jayliew 7y ago
> So what are you suggesting then? that tech workers leave "high paying jobs" to work for the DoD No. Have you not heard about the tech workers who voluntarily quit their civilian day jobs in protest of their employer, because
53.
by jayliew 7y ago
> We're not going to invade them. So, that is your opinion. The whole point of having a credible option to use violence, is that one is willing to use it. Otherwise, there is no credibility in the threat, which defeats the entire pu
54.
by jayliew 7y ago
Tech people: Rant about egregious things that China and Russia does (political, freedom, basic human rights, etc.) Also tech people: Vehemently oppose helping the US DoD with their highly-sought after skills, sign online petitions, protest
55.
Abusing /usr/bin/cat to hide commands in shell script(twitter.com)
1 points by jayliew 7y ago|0 comments
56.
by jayliew 7y ago
To be more accurate, this problem isn't gender specific. The problem is real and impacts everyone.
57.
Amazon Uses Explosive-Resistant Devices to Transfer Data to AWS(youtube.com)
2 points by jayliew 7y ago|0 comments
58.
“Instagram” before Instagram circa 2004(pcmag.com)
1 points by jayliew 7y ago|0 comments
59.
Now Even Funerals Are Livestreamed–and Families Are Grateful(wired.com)
1 points by jayliew 7y ago|0 comments
60.
by jayliew 7y ago
> The sad thing about the 4 things you listed is that the person in question is rarely conscious of employing those "anti-patterns" This is like with talk therapy. You can't help someone who doesn't want to be helped,

More ›