4 ms·
My logic (point 1 and 2) is a joke? What part about it do you not believe?
by jayliew 7y ago
My logic (point 1 and 2) is a joke? What part about it do you not believe?
- elif 7y agoWell... for one, it is illogical to infer geopolitically motivated chemical warfare from a personal charitable act. Especially so when coronavirus would not survive on the masks for the duration of a shipment from China...
- jayliew 7y agoSo, if you do the thing you suggested yourself, and NOT infer an assumption of a geopolitically motivated act coming from me, you will see that my logic as stated in point 1 and 2 is actually pragmatic and logical. Assume no malicious intention. How about we even assume that we paid for this stuff and Jack Ma didn't just hand it out for free. This is to remove your bias that a charitable gesture from someone, so that these products won't escape basic sensible scrutiny. Are you seriously going to use the products to aid in this national emergency, that was literally made in the country that this virus originated from ... without testing it at all to verify that it is free of the virus that started it all?
- scotty79 7y agoSound logic leads to garbage conclusion when it starts with false premises. Who knew it's really worth to learn about things you'd like to talk.
- jayliew 7y agoIf you pay close attention, you actually didn't refute my logic at all but called it "garbage" and "false". Ok man, you need to learn how to think through stuff and come back when you're ready.
- scotty79 7y agoI personally did not refute your logic because it doesn't matter if it's correct or not. It assumes falsehood and leads to "garbage" conclusions. Why would anyone want to consider what implication chain have you constructed between false and false?
- jayliew 7y agoI'm guessing you have nothing to refute because you don't have an opinion that matters. Have a great day! /End of pointless conversation with you/
- einmus 7y ago“Weakness and ignorance are not barriers to survival, but arrogance is.” You think China can't manufacture good quality mask, a simple mask? You people really are that arrogant?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- 2muchcoffeeman 7y agoIt’s worse than that. They believe it’s a Chinese conspiracy. One of the few countries to control the spread, but the tests they distribute will be ‘tainted’ and ‘ineffective’.
- jayliew 7y agoYou put words in my mouth. My concern isn't that it's not "good quality". My concern is, the thing is literally coming from the country where the virus originated from to begin with. Presumably, these things were made with human hands, of people in China, .. the country where this all started. So, ... you're telling me, you're just going to blindly assume these products have ZERO trace of the virus without any verification?
- scotty79 7y agoPls read what's known about this virus survivability outside of hosts body before you assume that item touched by infected person is "tainted" forever.