Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jariel
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
111 ms
·
931.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
"Maximum Pressure campaign's goal is to make people so miserable, they'd rather face bullets/wars." No, Iran, including the 'Regime' would actually be doing just fine if they dropped nuclear ambitions and
932.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
It's not true, and 'criticizing the government' should not be a crime anywhere. There are plenty of 'Rich People' in US jails.
933.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
Mikhail Khodorkovsky thought he was more powerful than the Russian government [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Khodorkovsky
934.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
"It's not speculative, it's literally what he and his lawyers said. " Then it's the most absolutely biased possible thing upon which to rule. Assange's isolation was a) self imposed and b) considerably better t
935.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
You folks may want to reconsider having photos in CVs. Not only are people going to be very strongly biased by race, ethnicity etc., but also by the trivialities of presentation: dress, apparent attitude, choice of background. All of those
936.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
The top starred repo (according to query: https://gh.clickhouse.tech/explorer/#counting-stars ) by stars is: https://gh.clickhouse.tech/explorer/#counting-stars Which is a 'protest' again
937.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
You are saying that those voters who are making choices of their own free will - are dim? (There is no voter suppression, murder of journalists or opposition after all) And consistently vote against their own best interests? Rather an Orien
938.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
"Mr. Assange’s mental health would deteriorate causing him to commit suicide with the “single minded determination” of his autism spectrum disorder." This would be entirely speculative for an MD let alone a Judge who doesn't
939.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
Your personal situation doesn't represent the market, moreover, you spent 20 years watching coke ads growing up and having coke, it's impossible to tell how that affected you. You saw 1000 'product placements' for coke w
940.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
So general societal progress and their control of covid is evil? The 'tracking for criminal cases' is clearly a 'bad thing' but ... it's also legit democracy with excellent universal healthcare and rule of law. ...
941.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
Great post - but they are 'not the good old days' today in terms of affordability in most places. Gentrification is not so bad, but hypergentrification is. There is a new form of 'Globalist/Consumerist' gentrificati
942.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
The answer is not complicated, and the logic on this board is strained by people I think that don't work in marketing. 1) Advertising works. 2) Coke, a sugary drink, is largely kept alive by smart marketing, that involves mostly advert
943.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
Text-based search ads - are completely different from - network banners ads. They are used for different reasons. 100% of ad buyers, marketing people know this, it's not an insight. Nobody is 'accidentally spending money' on
944.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
They are used for different things, by different countries that have different needs, situations, budgets, different support capabilities.
945.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
This comment implies pilots could magically be replaced by tech, and yet, that tech has never been used in any real scenario - ever. Wonder why? Because the kind of control offered by said tech just isn't remotely suitable for real mis
946.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
That's not quite the message. The message is, in low-grade conflicts, with varying situations, 'very small cheap drones' have a role. Turkey's drones are small, cheap, often used for reconnaissance - not exactly the role
947.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
No, the F22 has much better capabilities than the F35, and many of them are kept secret. The F22 is designed to be the 'Uber Alpha' of the Skies and to have no peer. It's made in the USA and is not sold to allies. The F35 is
948.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
So Uber has 15B revenue and they only spend 150M globally on acquisition ad spend. It'd seem to me that this is relatively thin, and likely wouldn't have any impact for some time. Uber is already well known - their spend in most c
949.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
"to is dispensing advice on how to handle and escape from predator" No - his advice of 'applying assertion' is definitely wrong in this context, where the advice should be 1) leave or 2) bend like a reed in the wind and
950.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
So that's a valid point actually (and probably still valid today), however the more obvious reason is that 25 years there was no evidence drones had any real material capability - especially given at that time, the US had no idea they&
951.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
I understood his point, I believe that he's way overstating the situation. I don't think he spoke specifically to the hyper-specific compulsion, but frankly I was: 'just don't take it with you' - or - 'put it
952.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
Do you remember life before the Internet? Because it reads as though maybe you don't remember. It's not that big of a deal, just put it away. You need your phone far less than you think you do, just put it away for some occasions,
953.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
There is an argument that it's crossing a magic boudnary to the point wherein it's almost like 'WiFi' as opposed to 'Wireless' in the sense that the bandwidth is there, and there is plenty of it. If Qualcomm an
954.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
Ok, but nobody can actually field that many drones (remember it's not just the craft, it's pilot, tech ground support, comms, rads, networks, etc.) especially in a scenario they are not suited for, and, it's not as though the
955.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
Yes. 'Prototype'. And they were 'prototyping' F35's 25 years ago. Since they could have made those 25 years ago - and chose not to - you have to contemplate why. Drones are mostly used for surveillance, tactical str
956.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
They would need advanced radar and other integrated systems, which they don't have today. Today, an F35 would clear out a squadron of drones way beyond the horizon, before the drones were aware of the F35. So yes 'a lot of drones&
957.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
But it is the case though. Jets today fly much faster than drones, even as you point out - they don't have the 'pilot limitation'. There are many reasons for that obviously, not just 'G Force'. Air Superiority Drone
958.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
They are not comparable. Drones are 'slow moving sitting ducks' that can be easily destroyed by an enemy with basic capabilities. You need 'some degree of air superiority' to use drones. That could mean extensive electro
959.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
No, this is totally overstating the situation. Also - you could say the same and yet much much more about Google. Google represents 10x the threat of FB because we all use it and essentially need it - and it's more broadly deployed.
960.
▲
by
jariel
6y ago
This is not like 'learn to defend yourself if you are physically attacked'. In this scenario, I suggest the advice would be to: 1) Get Out. 2) 'Bend like a reed in Wind' and avoid avoid avoid. Do your job as well as you
More ›