Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jannotti
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
jannotti
9y ago
Well, I'm not sure there's any definition that's going to come straight from first principles, but I see a wealth tax as something closer to the way we tax corporations, which is to tax "profit" not "revenue&qu
62.
▲
by
jannotti
9y ago
Did this blog post just try to coin the phrase "one thing" in place of the clearer and well-known "single point of failure"?
63.
▲
by
jannotti
9y ago
Counter argument. https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21731626-case-taxing-... In my opinion, a wealth tax (of which estate tax is one example) is much fairer than an income tax. It is somewhat difficult to lev
64.
▲
by
jannotti
9y ago
The article says 30% of what humans consume, so I think that means 30/130 = 23% of "all" meat products. (Where "all" is human plus pets.)
65.
▲
by
jannotti
9y ago
No, if such a startup sued FB, then would end up being a legal user of React under the BSD license, which does not terminate.
66.
▲
by
jannotti
9y ago
That may be what was said in a discussion, but it is incorrect. If your company sues Facebook for a patent, then you lose the extra patent grant , which means you would have only the original BSD license. Which is what ASF seems to want
67.
▲
by
jannotti
9y ago
That's the power of defaults. Italy changed to an opt-out program for donation, rather than opt-in.
68.
▲
by
jannotti
9y ago
Sure, I'm no lawyer, but I think I can state fairly confidently that this patent, http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=H... , does NOT cover the popular spinners of today.
69.
▲
by
jannotti
9y ago
Thanks for pointing this out. I didn't even notice that weird frisbee looking thing on first read. Those are not, or at least should not, be covered by the same patent.
70.
▲
by
jannotti
9y ago
Impressive job replying to what seems like a hatchet job, without losing his cool. But my favorite part: The next React will allow returning an array of components without a div wrapper. Small change, but it annoyed me to no end that it wa
71.
▲
by
jannotti
9y ago
Is it really worth saying that Lotto winners "Identified the correct lottery numbers"? It's true, I guess. But it doesn't really have any value, if that's all you mean. (And yes, I understand that you agree with t
72.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
This seems like a junk experiment. They asked people to perform a task that would be easier if you had some information. Then they started showing them videos. The subjects stopped watching when they had enough inspiration for their stor
73.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
That last part seems to really put a damper on things, since the problem the author describes is that a person with a hearing aid requires speakers to take turns. Apparently, when people speak together, the multiple voices clash. Even if
74.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
That's not what Trump says. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump...
75.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
He was reporting a deed. You are accepting Paula Jones comments as fact of a deed, but you are not accepting Trump's own self-report of his behavior as a deed. Remember that the tape also contained him saying things like, "I can&
76.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
Excellent, yes, that's exactly what I want.
77.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
React Native has been moving to give common modules common names across iOS and Android. That seems great, because it's easier to share code. I wonder why there isn't a simple set of wrappers for HTML widgets, using the React Na
78.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
Why is electromagnetic spectrum special? A convention center couldn't put poison in their air, couldn't stab people, couldn't libel anyone, couldn't cook meth, and couldn't produce patented pharmaceuticals in their
79.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
Right, I'd really like to know about the "random" process that assigned students to classrooms. I know that when I was in elementary school the assignments were theoretically random, but if parents really wanted to influence
80.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
Oddly, the article addresses Disney, but does so by saying that the photographer says there a difference. Except the difference is something about being indoors? Surprise twist, there's actually no difference, but the man has to sell
81.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
I was just struck at how Trumpian this sounds: "If there’s any doubt about that with our teams, let me be very clear: we have great desktops in our roadmap. Nobody should worry about that." Though I also notice the Obamian "l
82.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
I don't have an opinion on whether zestimates are accurate. But this blog post has 9 samples from only 3 cities. And the author seems to be making claims based on that. This is a lame "thought leadership" post as a subtle
83.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
Yeah, kind of true. But Apple not letting others implement iMessage is pretty similar. (I'm sure I could come up with examples for almost every other tech company as well.) I admit it feels weird that GNU is doing it, since the others
84.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
This seems almost exactly like all of React. These components do have state, just like a React component. If you're talking about how the state is changed, then now you're not talking about React. You're talking about redux
85.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
I don't see how this could possibly work even a little bit without Javascript. What would you fall back to? A static hunk of HTML? That could only work in the very specific case of a custom control that happens to have exactly the s
86.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
Does it remove it and redirect? If not, you're fine. I think that's why something like this is chosen. Your (server) app will rightly ignore that query parameter, but you'll probably still serve up the page. React is clie
87.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
Which still qualifies as "misleading"
88.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
Then maybe it works the other way. Can Tesla charge business owners? It would be surprising if the correct pricing is zero, not positive or negative.
89.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
What's interesting is that he did two things. 1) Spent about $1000 on light meters, domains, logo, upwork. and 2) Talked to a couple people, for free, that made him realize the idea can't work. (This conversation did not use any
90.
▲
by
jannotti
10y ago
It still wouldn't have been worth reading though. If an article uses a click-baity question, but acknowledges that its premise is a dumb one that people have used for years, that doesn't forgive it and suddenly make it a worthwhi
More ›