jakeogh

44 ms·

631.
by jakeogh 7y ago
I know, it's rough! I had to start FF to generate it. For some reason it wont work with webkit(surf ctrl-shift-s to JS).
632.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Ah, I misunderstood your mention of black boxes. This is not for black boxes. It only makes sense for open source. I agree it wont work for a black box that you cant audit. If the browser is side-channeling by asking for scheme://
633.
by jakeogh 7y ago
They dont get a socket. What's the socket for?
634.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Black box? I'm def not proposing any black box or "magic". It's open middleware, just like the glibc resolver. For example, it's entirely possible to force applications to use the glibc resolver, just dont let them
635.
by jakeogh 7y ago
We could force/sandbox apps that want access to the net to pass through middleware (with pinned keys etc) the user controls, and remove the SSL (really all networking) code from the apps. Want to resolve a name? Submit it here. Want to
636.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Not NRA. Sources are hyperlinked at the bottom. Which do you question?
637.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Wrong. It refers to how many studies Rand included that support the hypothesis. Note they dont list studies they excluded. You are _literally_ making stuff when you pretend it's a consensus. "Every single one" than Rand incl
638.
by jakeogh 7y ago
https://americangunfacts.com
639.
by jakeogh 7y ago
So you dont want all people to have this information?
640.
by jakeogh 7y ago
"Please take some time to back up your claims" fixed.
641.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Ironic.
642.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Would you rather individuals not have this information? --------------------------- EDIT: (comment limit) Without price transparency, it's impossible to shop around. It's also the only way to actually drive prices down, when peopl
643.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Surely you need to avoid the question you pretened to reply to.
644.
by jakeogh 7y ago
The sentence means the same thing without the word extraordinary.
645.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Giving individuals more information is unambigiously a good thing. The link has nothing to do with it, I only included it because you brought up skin color.
646.
by jakeogh 7y ago
HHS Press release: https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2018/08/01/trump-administrati... The rule: https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.g... Giving the people more i
647.
by jakeogh 7y ago
I cant imagine a logical thought process you could have gone through to conclude some people that you carve out would actually want less information. And then to attach your assumption to skin color... https://www.whitehouse.go
648.
Trump releases rule requiring hospitals and insurers to disclose rates(cnbc.com)
13 points by jakeogh 7y ago|16 comments
649.
by jakeogh 7y ago
It's distribution specific, but generally it gets loaded at every boot. It's not permanent. https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Microcode
650.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Oh, nothing! I think it's beyond excellent. I ran shellcheck to see if it was bash or sh and it didnt make a peep:). My Q is just asking if there is another similar quality tool. I see how you could interperit it the other way, thanks
651.
by jakeogh 7y ago
What am I missing? The binaries are the same. I dont see why paths matter. One can hash and intersect the sets.
652.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Is https://github.com/speed47/spectre-meltdown-checker the best tool? Impressive chunk of sh.
653.
by jakeogh 7y ago
The Rand meta-analysis disagrees with your conclusion. Specifically, row 4 column 8 at https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis.html is "LIMITED". Rand was specific in their labels, and Ran
654.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Why open source matters.
655.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Think it through. How would you "no" that? Step 1. Obtain bigger stick.
656.
by jakeogh 7y ago
I added the title, but I wouldnt do it justice, Scalia gives a fantastic overview of what the militia is in the first few minutes.
657.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Looks like it was recently (thankfully) reversed and remanded: https://ballotpedia.org/Rehaif_v._United_States Weird quirk with the huntling license, so that second example is a state law?
658.
by jakeogh 7y ago
You mean pulling out of the various wars? Or the awesome economey? Or just the BS media?
659.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Heller vs DC: https://s3.amazonaws.com/oyez.case-media.ogg/case_data/2007/...
660.
by jakeogh 7y ago
Have the higher courts have addressed that? The tourist example I'm expecting they _should_ since they are not breaking any law. Hm. Page 27: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44618.pdf I'm ignoring FFL

More ›