Wrong. It refers to how many studies Rand included that support the hypothesis. Note they dont list studies they excluded. You are _literally_ making stuff whe

Wrong. It refers to how many studies Rand included that support the hypothesis. Note they dont list studies they excluded. You are _literally_ making stuff when you pretend it's a consensus. "Every single one" than Rand included. Odd how "consensus" and "every analysis" about "concealed carry" (your words) actually means "a single study" (or is it 2?). The meta-analysis you hold in high regard disagrees with your conclusion. Your first comment is would be more accurate if you had said: "They simply noted that relaxing gun laws like allowing concealed carry leads to an increase in violent crime under a single analysis that Rand picked." (it could be 2, but I'm still holding out hope that you will list them:) Anyone can look up violent crime stats in "gun free" zones like the UK or Mexico (UK link: https://americangunfacts.com https://americangunfacts.com) It makes sense though, since you admit relying on a faith in Rand. You could buy the book and hold it high.