jaekash

11 ms·

61.
by jaekash 6y ago
> Or BitBucket But why would anybody ever do that?
62.
by jaekash 6y ago
> We've been self hosting GitHub Enterprise for years and it has had no downtime other than during scheduled updates (at night, when nobody's at work). Is it free to self host like GitLab or Gitea? If not, what does it offer th
63.
by jaekash 6y ago
Why are you not using an alternative?
64.
by jaekash 6y ago
> It's just your own feelings. Nope. Github is down, I don't feel it is down, it is down. Office 365 falls apart when two people try edit a spreadsheet at once. Outlook does not allow you to unreject a meeting invite. Windows w
65.
by jaekash 6y ago
You know if you use Microsoft products every day, and every day they let you down, and every day you experience the worst most unintuitive design in the world, and every day you have to deal with their reliability issues, and then MS acquir
66.
by jaekash 6y ago
Self hosting quickly becomes a mess of weird gatekeeping and bad maintenance. Almost never have I seed well maintained self hosted infrastructure. Most of the time it is installed, gatekept and then left to bitrot without any upgrades or ma
67.
by jaekash 6y ago
> But, UI of Gitlab is very bloated. I feel that UI of Github is less bloater than Gitlab. Bloated how? There is a lot of functionality in gitlab, and maybe there is a fair argument that the product itself is bloated, but the UI seems pr
68.
by jaekash 6y ago
"small" fuckups like this one have outsized impacts due to the amount of projects that use github. And the amount of people who just refuse to even consider gitlab is staggering.
69.
by jaekash 6y ago
I'm not privy to their management decisions, but I have used windows and azure, and I use office 365 every day, and this seems about right for Microsoft Quality.
70.
by jaekash 6y ago
What is going on that people expect something better from Microsoft? Really this is quite on par with the quality they deliver. The only surprising thing is that people are surprised by this.
71.
by jaekash 6y ago
again ... well done microsoft. well done. I really don't get why people keep using it, gitlab seems objectively better to me.
72.
by jaekash 6y ago
> The title is perfectly accurate, it’s an email thread about Linux kernel in-tree Rust support. The title the person you are responding to is complaining about is not the title of a email thread but the title of a hacker news post.
73.
by jaekash 6y ago
Same as the basis for what I responded to. Nothing.
74.
by jaekash 6y ago
> Buyers and sellers are welcome to believe otherwise, but in the long run they will lose money. Not if they sell it to someone else for a higher price.
75.
by jaekash 6y ago
> Ubuntu is clearly good software made by Canonical I can only speak for my own experience but if I had to choose between using Ubuntu for the rest of my life and losing a finger, I think I would lose a finger. There is no worse operatin
76.
by jaekash 6y ago
That seems like it would be great, except for that it would still be Canonical's work and with everything they do it would probably be better for everyone if they did not bother.
77.
by jaekash 6y ago
> Other distributions also use the Snap Store. Not if I can help it on fedora, and all things I ever tried form there did not work properly. > See the stats for the Skype snap package for the range of Linux distributions, https:&#x2F
78.
by jaekash 6y ago
My first thought when seeing this post links to snapstore was "ugh, not that garbage again". Every time I tried using Snappy on fedora it did not work and was so horrible I reverted to immediately removing snappy from my computer
79.
by jaekash 6y ago
The draft has it's issues, but the draft mentions ECDSA also without ever defining it and I'm sure I can find similar things in other accepted RFCs. I think there is some domain knowledge that can be reasonably assumed when writin
80.
by jaekash 6y ago
> The choice of DHT typically has protocolar implications, such as the use of XOR metric in Kademlia, or the bootstrap algorithm. > Furthermore, different DHTs have distinct properties, including provisions for fault tolerance, resour
81.
by jaekash 6y ago
> someone stating something in a fairly colloquial way, particularly something they thought was widely known, then having to progressively clarify the specific thing they meant when challenged by someone who didn't have the same fac
82.
by jaekash 6y ago
> Why would this be an IETF document when the GNUnet protocol itself isn't? Nothing in the spec suggests it must run on GNUnet. This is almost like asking why should IETF standardize JSON-schema when gRPC is not standardized. One th
83.
by jaekash 6y ago
Concerns regarding potential neurological complications != reports of neurological loss of smell. But you know that.
84.
by jaekash 6y ago
> That means that there's some non-obstructive issue here going on. Maybe you are not clear on what neurological and obstructive means, but non-obstructive is not the same as neurological. > It's not gish gallop to post a ti
85.
by jaekash 6y ago
Your first link, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/22/health/coronavirus-sympto... - makes no indication that the loss of smell is neurological. Your second link is purely speculative and not a report of n
86.
by jaekash 6y ago
> loss of taste and smell Not necessarily neurological and this is the first I heard that the loss of smell is neurological as opposed to physical[1]. But I guess everybody is a doctor now so go right ahead and say anything you like with
87.
by jaekash 6y ago
> This is nice in theory, except the amount of fragmentation in 2020 is huge. The GDPR popups is not nice in theory or practice.
88.
by jaekash 6y ago
> The way you describe it is clearly wrong Please cite the inaccuracy.
89.
by jaekash 6y ago
> The operative words you seem to be missing are "at the end of this", but fine. Okay, how about I just say no, at the end of this the USA won't have the most deaths per capita of industrialized nations. Amazingly my claim
90.
by jaekash 6y ago
Neither India nor China are considered industrialized countries. It could very well be that the person I replied to did not know what the phrase meant though, but it does have a very specific definition. https://en.wikipedia.org&

More ›