Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jMyles
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
40 ms
·
661.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
update: Just cut five more bluegrass tracks in East Nashville. :-) You'll hear them soon. You can hear my last record here: https://justinholmes.com/music/vowel-sounds/
662.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> Creators need to be compensated, absolutely, I'm working full-time on this issue, just in the context of my own music project. Stay tuned!
663.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> In an effort to "avoid the growth of piracy", Plex asked GitHub to remove a repository that allows people to reshare libraries that were not originally theirs. I am so sick of the policing of copying of data masquerading as
664.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
A theory being a conspiracy theory is unrelated to whether or not NSF has funded a particular study. The two question are very simple: * What is the crime being planned? * Who are the conspirators? If there are cognizable answers to those -
665.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Even when (maybe especially when) people greviously harm others for profit, prison still doesn't make sense. How is putting this person in a cage (and filling the coffers of prison profiteers) supposed to restore his victims?
666.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Maybe to follow users during a single discrete trip through the space?
667.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
This only applies to projects whose authors seek to comply with the whims of a particular jurisdiction. Surely there are plenty of project prospects - even commercial in nature - which don't have this limitation.
668.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Whew! As a long-time lover of The Green Pill, it was great getting to sit down and talk about a few of my favorite topics with Kevin. Studying and telling the weird and wonderful origin story of cypherpunk, and its roots in Grateful Dead ta
669.
▲
The unlikely shared origins of bluegrass and blockchains [video]
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
jMyles
3y ago
|
1 comments
670.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> Is the quintessential experience meant to be soulless and grating? Of course not. Few things in life are more fulfilling than a job you absolutely love and are excited to whack at every single day. But your question raises another one
671.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Really takes the "inter" out of it, doesn't it?
672.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
* researchers and clinicians
673.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> This is where Covid is listed on the death certificate as the primary cause of death. Everyone that dies of cardiac arrest or cancer also has a belly button. Where are you getting death certificate data for 2023? I can't seem to
674.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
I don't see anybody advocating for no public health measures - perhaps you might consider that the views of others are as nuanced as yours. > Or, just go to pre-1950s graveyards and gather data on how many dead children there were b
675.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Of course. And John Ioannidis. And Jay Bhattacharya. And Martin Kulldorf. And Stefan Baral. And Sunetra Gupta. And Vinay Prasad. And dozens of other acclaimed researchers who represent the core of the incredible, laudable, essential, dear
676.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> Covid is still over 2% of all deaths in the U.S. The presence of a particular pathogen (or for that matter, any phenomena) coincident with death is not a meaningful metric. Nearly 100% of human deaths involve a person with a belly butt
677.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
I think any reasonable observer can conclude that we have reached a point in the discussion in which it is evident that you are not participating in good faith. > That sentence is not in question. It doesn't exist anywhere in the re
678.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> Shooting a virus at a masked mannequin in a lab Your point is even stronger than you make it sound. Nobody shot a virus at anything. They shot beads of polystyrene latex. If you woke up from a dream where such a study occurred, you
679.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Please, I beg for your sensibility and brief attention here. This issue continues to tear fissures in what seem like otherwise reasonable and literate communities. The sentence in question is: "Wearing masks in the community probably
680.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> I'd more restate it as "for a given population size, enough people would mess up that making everyone wear one would not slow the spread of the disease". ...but this is even less conservative than the review summary, whi
681.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Yeah, seems so. So the tests are good as confirmatory devices. But yeah, it was extremely unserious when they were used to gatekeep public events, etc. The reasonable presumption has always been that transmission of respiratory pathogens wi
682.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
In an unlikely turn of events, you appear to be an actual human and not a bot (from a cursory look at your comment history). So I say, gently: > because evidently your approach to life prioritizes your immediate gratification Do you gen
683.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Well put. Though I suspect that the overwhelming majority of the sentiment to which you are referring is being carried by bots and not real humans. It's a difficult time to be empirically-driven, though hopefully we will come out bette
684.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
My presumption is that the downvotes are related to this unsourced and incorrect assertion: > As we know, COVID infections are almost unknown when infected individuals consistently wear a high-quality fitted mask.
685.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
...this link is not a new RCT. It is an article about the Cochrane review which we all read a long time ago. And, despite the (somewhat reasonable) chagrin expressed by the authors, the Cochrane review did indeed show that masks are largel
686.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
When you say, "so bad", you mean in terms of sensitivity? They seem to be sufficiently selective, but under-sensitive. So, not great for risk aversion.
687.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
You say this as if it is established fact, but there has been no RCT convincingly showing the effect you are describing - typically called "source control" - can be achieved from the use of a respirator to interdict individual tra
688.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> boeing is needed for national sovereignty concerns. Same reasons all other countries have flagship carriers. Is there a connection between flag carrier airlines and aircraft manufacturing? That never occurred to me, since most flag c
689.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
I agree with you 100% on your assessment of what can be known, but I think I disagree nearly as strongly on your assessment of the humanity that springs from attempting to know it. To exist in the state you describe - with neither start sta
690.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> we haven't made any new discoveries in cosmology in the past two decades Is that true? At least for my hobbyist understanding of the progress of cosmology, quite a lot seems to have happened in the past two decades. Confirmation o
More ›