Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jMyles
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
691.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Reading your comment, I was certain I remembered it - and I see that you've now added a link to its previous home. So I just wanted to say: it was an impactful piece of writing, enough so that I remembered it quite clearly after a sing
692.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
So much of this thread is concerned not with the achievement of this data set, but with the (by comparison) silly and outdated spat over how to frame it as "property" for the purposes of government intervention (pursuant to which
693.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
That's more than a slight nitpick - it corrects a core misunderstanding to be found everywhere this discussion seems to be happening. To wit: AI articles are to be found along a dramatic spectrum of quality. If such an article is high
694.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> the same kind of government response a terrorist attack gets. Has that particular kind of response ever achieved anything? (Anything germane to the concern at hand, I mean - of course it has often achieved enriching well-connected con
695.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> Ubisoft Employees In France have gone on a Stike Presumably the spelling oddity in this headline is a typo - the article calls the event a "day of organized strike action." (emphasis mine)
696.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Haha, yeah. But the story I tell is of the evolution of the tradition we have come to denote with words like "Americana" and "Appalachian traditional" into a crypto-anarchist sentiment, from Carter Family -=> Bill Mon
697.
▲
Guidelines for playing bluegrass at crypto events
(github.com)
12 points
by
jMyles
3y ago
|
2 comments
698.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
If anything, a technology demonstrating its capacity to continue to function normally in the face of illicit use cases is an indication of its viability for inclusion in the next human chapter. If you tell us that a technology seems to prec
699.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Well, I do distribute via some centralized platforms (including some odious ones like Spotify). But I'd like to put forward a practice that demonstrates that the tools that have been smeared as anti-artist (chiefly but not only bittorr
700.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Sure, but I'd like to go beyond magnet links and make it properly decentralized, with the discovery happening in the DHT and torrent swarm.
701.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
No I hadn't! This seems exciting. Have you done it successfully?
702.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
It's kinda like the owl with the tootsie pop: How many cups of coffee does it take to internalize hamming distance? :-)
703.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Most of the things that seem like good ideas for KYC, such as DMCA claims, are better to be rendered nonexistent in the first place.
704.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Interesting. I want to seamlessly distribute my music through bittorrent, but since I have a small fan base (and thus, a very small potential seeding pool), I found it difficult to connect all the moving parts. I'll give Bitmagnet a tr
705.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
There's nothing borderline about it. It's a barrier to creativity, designed to protect a particular model of music industrialization, and is not widely viewed as helpful as far as I can tell (and I discuss this matter with colleag
706.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Do you have a sense of whether you can distinguish between the five endemic named coronaviruses? And whether you can distinguish between those and rhinoviruses / adenoviruses / etc? There was another poster on that thread who said
707.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Interesting question. If you get into a cab, and the driver is clearly drunk or exhibits violent behavior on the road, surely you have some responsibility to terminate your ride. So if you get into a Tesla with it's wink-wink-nudge-nud
708.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Hear hear. But how?
709.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> rather than owned by the states or the fed. Are those actually the only options for public goods focus though? I generally lean softly toward anarchic solutions, so of course my mind goes toward some kind of non-profit NGO or DAO rathe
710.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
This turned into a wild and (perhaps understandably) aggressive discussion. After reading all of the back-and-forths here, I just wanted to thank you for continually being the clarifying force in this discussion, even amidst the downvotes a
711.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
(re-reading: this reads like a rant against Netflix, which is mostly isn't meant to be: I honor Netflix's attempt to beat the competing no-IP model by being easy-to-use and comprehensive. Unfortunately for basically everyone, it
712.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
...it's difficult to compete against even when you have the state willing to make threats of violence on your behalf if they utilize the competing model. It seems like this says more about the future of so-called "intellectual pro
713.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> nerds suck at communicating Well, it might start by not tarring other people as "normal" or "ordinary" and separating off "the normal world". Consider that everybody has a unique life and story, and that e
714.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> They get out gunned by the AAA studios What does this even mean? Nobody was prevented from making a game; you are just describing the market dynamics of the previous human configuration, which of course are going to change along with t
715.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
I don't love this model. It feels so censorable and state-adjacent. All states need to do is convince whoever controls the satellites to accept their terms. It's such a small number of points of failure. The mesh model, where e
716.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> It is a 737 variant In name only, and by dint of software cludges to prime the vividness of our ability to imagine that pilots needn't be separately type-rated. ...but we all know that if it weren't for MCAS (and by extension
717.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
I'm also skeptical of the "took our jobs" argument with respect to making art and music. I think art and music is easier to make in the presence of AI.
718.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
> try to displace as much human labor as possible > stifling this is a benefit I suppose this depends in part on how much value you place on keeping the world a laborious place for humans. Reducing the need for labor will almost cer
719.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
Now do infectious pathogens.
720.
▲
by
jMyles
3y ago
At the risk of hyperbole: It seems that, as AI becomes the prevalent model for human-computer interaction, requirements like this are not merely stifling to AI (and to the speech, press, and even religious protections that may arise from su
More ›