itemize123

4 ms·

31.
by itemize123 2mo ago
the underlying cause of addiction is very different. But if there is enough evidence that they're similarly damaging (in magnitude), I think that fundamental difference is irrelevant.
32.
by itemize123 2mo ago
how is it mutually exclusive
33.
by itemize123 2mo ago
exactly, I found that it's eerily similar to those marketing copies. gets obnoxious
34.
by itemize123 2mo ago
when you make assertions that can be checked, check them please. doubly check it when it's contrarian.
35.
by itemize123 2mo ago
question's phrasing made your judgement obvious
36.
by itemize123 2mo ago
what is lacking is a benchmark. I think the OP is trying to elicit that.
37.
by itemize123 2mo ago
completely agree. while I share dario's concerns, his letter is very intellectually dishonest.
38.
by itemize123 2mo ago
quite simply because models become better?
39.
by itemize123 2mo ago
I think it's possible; But in the same vein, amongst other things, regulation is a transparent trojan horse to stop open-weight models - they would, on the next phase, argue that guardrails can be fine-tuned away if weights are open et
40.
by itemize123 3mo ago
i think they could - there is an equivalence of trade dumping and trade protectionism here.
41.
by itemize123 3mo ago
just protectionism argument would suffice no?
42.
by itemize123 3mo ago
once you read the book, and learn from it and use the knowledge in your livelihood - you have to perpetually pay the author? Doesn't sound right.
43.
by itemize123 3mo ago
or, hear me out, advertisers can do real-time advertising based on hyper-now context
44.
by itemize123 3mo ago
obviously, a universal model doesn't exist since the signals are non-stationary but it's way better than what tarot reading
45.
by itemize123 3mo ago
what do you mean by this is solved?
46.
by itemize123 4mo ago
thinking aloud here - so it seems like 2 things are taken as intuitive here: a) energy is conserved in any frame of reference. b) energy can vary in 2 frame of references. but then what it feels like is that when you reference the energy as
47.
by itemize123 4mo ago
it's not regulatory capture, because they are not regulating what customers can use - it's limiting what some companies can serve. it's way less impactful to the market as a whole.
48.
by itemize123 4mo ago
literally the opposite of regulatory capture - it spells trouble for specifically openai and anthropic mostly
49.
by itemize123 4mo ago
what's the future market for that? won't Micron in particular have to be a counterparty to that anyway to ensure delivery - why would they want that??
50.
by itemize123 4mo ago
I would categorize the op as "technically false" but if they don't voluntarily delay, they would be export controlled.
51.
by itemize123 4mo ago
easy - lobbying
52.
by itemize123 4mo ago
it's not just media. or rather media is reporting based on fund interests.
53.
by itemize123 4mo ago
sounds even more plausible under that scenario?
54.
by itemize123 4mo ago
tinfoil doesn't seem to distinguish between cached and input tokens. I think that would make it untenably expensive
55.
by itemize123 4mo ago
u seem to be the only one who used it here - how did it compare to opus and gpt5.5? in theory it should be at least on par if not better at times right.
56.
by itemize123 4mo ago
u get a pool of them + sakana?
57.
by itemize123 4mo ago
it's just one of their products right
58.
by itemize123 4mo ago
what decisions did the CEO do that you would believe is poor? Just conceptually if examples are make you too easily identifiable - iam purely curious.
59.
by itemize123 4mo ago
u cant compare productivity to games on the metric of bring joy - ofc productivity tool isn't bring joy like a game does.
60.
by itemize123 4mo ago
how come? this is a very weird take- why is the focus on ppl suffering instead of like fairness or capital / market efficiency ?

More ›