itemize123

3 ms·

1.
by itemize123 5d ago
no way. one is functionally (slightly overhyped) magic. another is better tool.
2.
by itemize123 8d ago
it's easy to want one
3.
by itemize123 8d ago
i agree, it's essentially copywriting
4.
by itemize123 8d ago
u end up with stack based heap likes anyways
5.
by itemize123 8d ago
unfortunately, the worse of both can be true at once.
6.
by itemize123 10d ago
if you are reading the comments - it's news to a lot of less-wired-in persons (like most of us)
7.
by itemize123 16d ago
and still they denied it - it only shows that we have little recourse.
8.
by itemize123 17d ago
I think it's worse - openai didn't even deny training on their exact manuscript (when they most likely opted out);
9.
by itemize123 17d ago
it's buried because due to the drama the evidence is scarce
10.
by itemize123 17d ago
this is not untrue but it's a pendulum swinging back to ancient times man
11.
by itemize123 17d ago
I think you are overestimating things. While there will be people who don't know - it's probably not as many as you think.
12.
by itemize123 24d ago
interesting, c -> c++ transition should be smooth though
13.
by itemize123 24d ago
that's fair. but it outputted non-best version in the first place sometimes too. Now it still output non-best version sometimes.
14.
by itemize123 25d ago
literally not how it works.
15.
by itemize123 25d ago
so simply then ratio isn't just dl/up
16.
by itemize123 28d ago
naming schemes can produce uncountably inf names
17.
by itemize123 28d ago
i think there must be a scheme of naming that is uncountably infinite too.
18.
by itemize123 28d ago
that's optimizing a pretty fast already portion of code. unlikely it's the difference maker.
19.
by itemize123 1mo ago
bigger than RotW
20.
by itemize123 1mo ago
One, logically, your statement doesn't follow. They're two different companies that have primarily in different market segment. Two, it's not true in the first place - did we side with apple and its cut of the app store reven
21.
by itemize123 1mo ago
not constructive, but also not personal. rude but based on observed facts.
22.
by itemize123 1mo ago
ondemand cloud? b2b?
23.
by itemize123 1mo ago
it's because it is a narrow set of never-pay-a-human. in that world, only certain task won't be done by human.
24.
by itemize123 1mo ago
main reason is the 30days retention; not the plan changes
25.
by itemize123 1mo ago
but surely u differentiate by turns?
26.
by itemize123 1mo ago
such a weird thread because everyone seems to know what they are talking about but definitely seem to miss something. but basically one would be differentiating to 2pi x rather than x. and things will work out
27.
by itemize123 1mo ago
i dont understand, isn't the arguing just some form prompt steering?
28.
by itemize123 1mo ago
im sorry u feel this way
29.
by itemize123 1mo ago
but, importantly, it is not the main reason why people are skeptical of bun rewrite right
30.
by itemize123 1mo ago
it's just inaccurate data prior to microsft acq

More ›