itemize123

4 ms·

61.
by itemize123 4mo ago
Would you explain this - " I'm starting to think we would get more done if nobody on my team used Copilot." ? Interesting to see if you why you see it destructive. I can certainly see that a lot of the times, copiloted soluti
62.
by itemize123 4mo ago
don't agree with your logic at all - agree with your conclusion. your logic is deeply flawed - a) you've to justify mediocre engineers not been necessary, the mechanism they are pushed out by LLM matters. b) relative ranking is us
63.
by itemize123 5mo ago
if it helps - i strongly agree with you
64.
by itemize123 5mo ago
it's actually easy to be turing complete. it's a feat for a system to be non-turing complete and be "complex".
65.
by itemize123 5mo ago
does your pricing take account of cached vs uncached token?
66.
by itemize123 5mo ago
they are doing it through state investment vehicles - so it's in the same way US companies can (but won't)
67.
by itemize123 5mo ago
is it a net-win for the company? Are the AI-TOD any good?
68.
by itemize123 5mo ago
what would you say the disconnect was? Was it a simple case of that your teams' not comfortable with merging AI code?
69.
by itemize123 5mo ago
nothing foolish about trying even if he too thinks it's inevitable. it's foolish however to think that there won't be nuances of such a future (and somehow no one can influence the nuances).
70.
by itemize123 5mo ago
yup - security reviews.
71.
by itemize123 5mo ago
run it hosted on another provider - it's less censored there
72.
by itemize123 5mo ago
actually distillation is without weights - you basically just need a black box teacher model.
73.
by itemize123 5mo ago
try on another provider - it is open weights.
74.
by itemize123 5mo ago
it will be more expensive when subsidization ends? how is it going to be more inclusive?
75.
by itemize123 5mo ago
agreements don't always hold up to legal scrutiny. In cases where it is unreasonable, it won't be able to stand up in court. And in any case, this is not a legal matter but a user experience / public opinion one
76.
by itemize123 5mo ago
you are being very disingenuous. there are certain expectations from a software vendor. taking things into extreme, if something install malware as an update on your computer, is it not a silly claim that it is free for vendor to do so?
77.
by itemize123 5mo ago
with physical access right?
78.
by itemize123 5mo ago
basically very verbose and detailed but also very indirect. didn't get to the point till the end.
79.
by itemize123 6mo ago
same, i really dislike opencode's UX. there are a lot of agents harnesses actually. check out terminal bench 2.0 for example. dirac.run seems to be make the rounds earlier
80.
by itemize123 6mo ago
google's the middleman, and it won't capture the whole 1600 right?
81.
by itemize123 6mo ago
you are missing the picture here. would you then agree that agentic + selection is better than hand-written + selection? in that case, even if the advantage is project selection, nobody would choose to work in a hand-written way right?
82.
by itemize123 6mo ago
unless the 5.4 price is a huge loss leader for them
83.
by itemize123 6mo ago
probably the wrong take - they are arm racing to a better model. it's not enshittification era for models just yet
84.
by itemize123 6mo ago
obviously no. if algos work in china, it will work with spacex
85.
by itemize123 6mo ago
make the point directly - you are just avoiding further justification
86.
by itemize123 6mo ago
can you also add a way to allow it to be used without screen-recording permissions?
87.
by itemize123 6mo ago
are you sure other forms of language to express urgency doesn't work as well or better?
88.
by itemize123 6mo ago
yes speech to text exists
89.
by itemize123 6mo ago
if it's not broken then we trust the assertion that it's broken. if it's broken then it's broken. it's analysis of what is broken is probably wrong or at least incomplete though
90.
by itemize123 6mo ago
and yet we're black box too

More ›