Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
isodev
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
211.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
Free Trump VPN to go with one's Trump Phone?
212.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
But it’s nice to think we can eventually end up as one big planet building things instead of 200+ tiny bickering states that need to redo all the work
213.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
This site is not for bots, go away please.
214.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
I used it as another “there was a strong tech push but ultimately we couldn’t make it work” kind of idea. With NFTs the grift was immediately visible, with LLMs it’s a bit harder, the whole “AI” facade gives people hope - I want to believe
215.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
Rubio is a mouthpiece for a regime that’s not qualified to discuss Europe, or even his very own US of A. All he meant in his speech is that his government has chosen isolation
216.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
Cyberspace promised us we can all work together to create things, like one species coming together to solve problems. Now in 2026, we need to “space” for every little tribe…
217.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
That assumes LLMs are relevant and will be around a year from now. Let’s not forget NFTs. Your comment is also blind to the absurd amount of research and projects which are born here but later move to look for funding. So the EU is not irre
218.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
Some refer to the “Tim Cook doctrine” as a reason for Swift’s existence. It’s not meant to be good, just to fulfill the purpose of controlling that part of their products, so they don’t have to rely on someone else’s tooling.
219.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
Swift never felt truly open source either. That people can propose evolution points doesn’t change the fact that Apple still holds all the keys and pushes whatever priorities they need, even if they’re not a good idea (e.g. Concurrency, Swi
220.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
I share the sentiment of the post. The best I can describe it is that I’m tech-savvy enough to know that “AI” is just not capable of what people want it to do and yet I apparently lack the “broligarch” gene required for me to ignore the tec
221.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
"the euros"? As opposed to what, "the hillbillies"?
222.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
> 2. Any pretense for AI Safety concerns that had been coming from OpenAI really fall flat with this move. And Peter, creating what is very similar to giant scam/malware as a service and then just leaving it without taking responsib
223.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
But now that we do, we know how to be smarter about it going forward
224.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
That’s excellent news. I always find it strange that companies would go as far as to destroy unsold items instead of just donating or recycling them.
225.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
A CTO that codes? Interesting indeed.
226.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
The addictive nature of the technology persists though. So even if we say certain skills are required to use it, then also it must come with a warning label and avoided by people with addictive personalities/substance abuse issues etc.
227.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
Haha this. I understand the appeal of "but I can probably roll my own" and "Oh that's a good idea, let's jump into coding" but pre-vibe bots, the effort required would make folks stop and think before jumping i
228.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
I don’t get it. What does it do? How can I trust it over simply visiting https://www.npmjs.com/ (which is perfectly fine to browse)? Edit: it wants me to connect to the “atmosphere” - is this the Bluesky App Store thing? I
229.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
One can also see it like: The grievance is apparent to every iOS user who has used pre-iOS 18 keyboards or any of the major Android keyboards. It’s also not just one problem, autocorrect and the keyboard combined make for at least a dozen s
230.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
> Siri doesn’t always properly process queries or can take too long to handle requests, they said I mean, for anyone familiar with LLMs this is not exactly a surprise. There is no way Apple can remove the inherent downsides of this techn
231.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
I think the point of the post was how something useless (AI) and its poorly implemented scrapers is wrecking havoc in a way that’s turning the internet into a digital desert. That Cloudflare is trying to monetise “protection from AI” is jus
232.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
So let's recap: - I click skills. - The first one is WireGuard "... secure routing and key management". - I'd download it, hook it to this bot running on my system. - I'd ask the bot to store / manage super-sec
233.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
And donate to Homebrew, like a civilised person
234.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
> Then you are boned Must be my lucky day! Too bad my dream of being that while the bots are taking care of the coding is still sort of fiction. I love a future when this is possible but what we have today is more of a proof of concept.
235.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
That’s not what Claude and Codex put there when you ask them to init it. Also, the global view is most definitely bigger than their tiny, loremipsum-on-steroids, context so what do you do then?
236.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
We’ve always been responsible for design and validation. Nothing has changed there. It’s funny how the vibe coding story insists we shouldn’t look at the code details but when it’s pointed out the bots can’t deal with a “messy” (but validat
237.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
And what if the foundation was made by the AI itself? What’s the excuse then?
238.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
You’re mixing the terms I think. Reproducible builds is not the same as reproducible outcomes. Rebuilding your project with a different version of a dependency is not the same as suddenly a program accepts txt files as attachments instead o
239.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
What we call AI at the heart of coding agents, is the averaged “echo” of what people have published on the web that has (often illegitimately) ended up in training data. Yes it probably can spit out some trivial snippets but nothing near wh
240.
▲
by
isodev
8mo ago
> 1:1 reproducibility is much easier in LLMs than in software building pipelines What’s a ‘software building pipeline’ in your view here? I can’t think of parts of the usual SDLC that are less reproducible than LLMs, could you elaborate?
More ›