isodev

53 ms·

841.
by isodev 2y ago
Yup, the person wearing one literally gets the “drives a cybertruck” spotlight.
842.
by isodev 2y ago
At the very least so one doesn’t sneeze over the person on the next seat.
843.
by isodev 2y ago
> unparalleled opportunity to… Well, the Vision Pro has no substantial unique features which aren’t available via the older Quest even. Sure, Apple over-engineered the lenses to the point of excluding people who don’t conform to the pres
844.
by isodev 2y ago
Or KDE Plasma… they’ve been making amazing things with look and feel in the last couple of releases. Either way, that much customisation and user control on an iPad… practically unheard of.
845.
by isodev 2y ago
The beautiful hardware of the Mac is so wasted with recent versions of macOS.
846.
by isodev 2y ago
> Is this game well-known enough in Britain and Ireland I’m from elsewhere in Europe and I know about it from high school and it’s also something that pops up in the world sports section on news websites every now and then.
847.
by isodev 2y ago
That's a double win in my book.
848.
by isodev 2y ago
> we wanted it to work with whatever database While this is an option, making an app work with different database backends is not usually why one picks a library like Ecto or ActiveRecord. You see, these frameworks bring a tone of facili
849.
by isodev 2y ago
I really don’t get the purpose of these immersive videos. Can anyone of the 10-ish people who owns a Vision Pro share their experience of watching them? I feel that if Apple wants to make a new immersive content format into a thing, they sh
850.
by isodev 2y ago
lol, that’s rich coming from Mozilla. In fact, every Big Tech currently marketing “privacy” (including Apple) means something else. It’s just a buzzword now, like crypto used to be about encryption.
851.
by isodev 2y ago
Is this Apple PR trying to stop people from buying Meta VR/MR hardware? I mean it’s Facebook, we get it. But they make WhatsApp and they make affordable and actually working Quest and now glasses… I’m not going to get triggered by opin
852.
by isodev 2y ago
I think it’s clear the spirit of my comment was to mean that the descendants of the original owners would be one of the parties with a claim to have their artefacts repatriated. It’s clearly not a strictly geographical problem.
853.
by isodev 2y ago
I don’t see the controversy of your example because since there was no UNESCO and other global agreements in the 1500s, the indigenous people of this area are still around and so it would be the local Native American tribes that can have a
854.
by isodev 2y ago
I’m not sure I follow - The items were taken from somewhere at some point in time and now there is a country on that territory.
855.
by isodev 2y ago
> isn’t the rightful owner. And who is qualified to determine the "rightful owner"? The current government of the nation from which the items were taken is the one in charge of policy regarding their cultural and historical art
856.
by isodev 2y ago
It's ok to watch, that's just the nickname of the device because of how risky it is to use.
857.
by isodev 2y ago
I'm also quite stunned. For a corp that's been running an electronic shopfront for years, something like this shouldn't be that big of a surprise.
858.
by isodev 2y ago
EU? This lawsuit is taking place in the states (CA).
859.
by isodev 2y ago
I don't think there is appetite for this, in big tech especially. People are looking for glamorous next big things, everyone wants to be the first in some green field thing instead of digging into "the boring stuff we've been
860.
by isodev 2y ago
I'm absolutely flabbergasted how much money and political capital is spent on vaporware, while there are very concrete and very impactful challenges we could be addressing instead.
861.
by isodev 2y ago
Thank you!
862.
by isodev 2y ago
Can someone share a non twitter link? For those of us who can’t access it.
863.
by isodev 2y ago
Or perhaps it’s just not that good with other languages and accents.
864.
by isodev 2y ago
That's not it, Mozilla decided to leave the fediverse and has been loading Firefox with AI and opt-out tracking features. All while still being funded by Big G.
865.
by isodev 2y ago
I wasn't thinking of Meta's products, just how social networks are supposed to work. Leon trying to tweak things is just not acceptable (not to mention dangerous... blocking is there for a reason).
866.
by isodev 2y ago
Why? For me it's the opposite. "Public" is a label for a specific type of audience - everyone with access to my feed/timeline (as opposed to a subset like friends, followers etc). If I block someone, they no longer have
867.
by isodev 2y ago
Indeed, blocking means blocking and the person posting content must have the tools to curate who can access their content. This is not just me saying it because it sounds logical, it's also a requirement for platforms with user generat
868.
by isodev 2y ago
Well, certainly don't rely on forums to get your legal info. Feel free to consult someone versed with data protection regulations in countries where your app is available.
869.
by isodev 2y ago
As the app developer you clearly control the means of processing, you are the data controller. You may have opted for “offline processing” which simplifies your compliance, but it is still processing under your control (and subject to chang
870.
by isodev 2y ago
It's funny because it's true. You can always count on the defenders of the Corp. to show up when needed.

More ›