isityouyesitsme

10 ms·

61.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
I can agree with a lot of what you wrote, and especially outcome vs. the original OOP promises. They meant one thing, and it turned out that thing is actually an anti pattern (inheriting implementations and state, not merely inheriting inte
62.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
Your straw men fall easily. But your "snipe" doesn't even apply. I spent the two years of my masters program editing a NASA-owned LISP codebase. it wasn't huge. Maybe 100kloc. But I'm definitely not ignorant or LISP
63.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
Well, maybe. But that is a different debate. I do not see where this topic was raised, except by you right here.
64.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
You are reading in to what I wrote something I did not say. I said that "OOP has become the foundation," not "OOP is the foundation." There is a very big, historical, fact-based distinction between those two statements.
65.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
I don't think OOP has failed at all. It has become the foundation of all reusable code in every language. What failed was the idea that internal state can be managed and shared with derived classes. The key to OOP is extracting the ide
66.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
Every conversation in this thread where someone implies what is "enough" "passion" or "accomplishment" makes me agree more with unionizing the industry. It's as though the absence of religion in modern lif
67.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
I guess with a sample size of 1, I would also be tempted to make sweeping generalizations on an entire industry if the sole same was my own experience.
68.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
I'm not so sure. Maybe by literal line count. Maybe not by all targets in a large project. Literally every time in my life I've updated from version A of a compiler to version B of the same exact compiler, I had weeks of change se
69.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
I think you're missing the author's point about the mower laws. It was specifically in the context of lost livelihood, not that people are offended at mower laws. The same applies for the vehicle manufacturing mandate 13 years awa
70.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
It must be frustrating for you to be so sure of what your opponents think and feel, yet never able to understand what made them vote for the Orange Man. You are the reason the Orange Man was foisted upon the US. We are going to get more of
71.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
"out of spec" means that it is out of specification. It is literally not specified. You are doing something that is not specified. It is therefore an action that is out of specification. it is therefore out of spec. If there was a
72.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
In my career, the big cancer has been decent engineers thinking they're good managers and end up making everyone up and down the chain miserable because all they know is a command-and-control style managing, or passive-aggressive style
73.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
I have zero problems with how Australia plans to meet its transportation needs. I do not live there. In the US, I also do not care much about whether cars are EV or not (my only actual hangup about EV as a technology is the raw material sou
74.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
I am not certain the point of this, tbh. I am discussing the mentality of the opposition in the US and the reasons they cite where the EV solution does not work for them. If your government is committed to making it work by 2035, that'
75.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
yes, I misread (or more accurately didn't read) user names. Apologies for that. But no, what I said was not false. I said that I suspect there are other locations in the world where this is true (meaning northern US isn't the only
76.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
Right, so because your state and country is ahead in this area, everyone else is "a hut in Siberia?" My comment specifically mentioned a 2030 or 2035 mandate, which is a US mandate. Why would you argue against a US mandate by talk
77.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
C'mon, you have to purposefully be this obtuse. There's no other way it can happen. Literally any location in the northern US, especially the more rural and more dense urban, and doubly true if you make under 30k per household per
78.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
OK, 10 years behind EV. It makes sense that it is where it is. Please point out anywhere where anyone says the accomplishments are not remarkable on their own, if you are not comparing them to the thing with 100 years infra behind it. Now c
79.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
As someone who is also fully vaccinated, I am not sure how you can say it is overall good simply because most people will not react poorly. That is like saying Russian Roulette is a perfectly fine game to play because only one person is goi
80.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
I think the important thing is lost. Average is useless for determining if a grid (and it is not THE grid, since localities have bottlenecks) can support a load in time. Maybe it can, but the on statistic given as evidence is an average, wh
81.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
right, but everyone within a region commutes at roughly the same time, had roughly the same weekend schedule, etc. etc. There was that story a couple years ago about England's electrical grid and specific localities being stressed beca
82.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
I'm not sure if you're trying to tell a joke or not. The amount of effort you took to explain the post says you aren't joking, but choosing the average as the number you base your case on says you are.
83.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
I missed one question. I don't understand why you believe that forcing the process that is requesting the allocation to deal with it is the best thing generally. From a systems perspective, it is actually worse because there's a s
84.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
It is in fact not merely necessary because the OS will overcommit. Even without overcommit, you hit the same problem, except you have no way to decide how to handle it---the application requesting the allocation suffers. I guess my entire p
85.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
I think you are missing the point of an OOM kill. The intention is to keep the SYSTEM healthy, not any one application. Let me assure you, system-wide, this policy is sane. Do you have any idea what happens when the kernel is not able alloc
86.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
"we don't have 20 years to continue extraction." Define. There have been way too many climate-induced doomsday predictions with such imminence as to force hysteria to take you at face value. There were also about 145 billion
87.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
The modern form of argumentation on display here: "I'm not going to argue against what you say you believe, I'm going to assert you believe something else and attack that, or group you with people who believe differently tha
88.
by isityouyesitsme 4y ago
Yeah, because whatever YOU work on has nothing an outsider can throw a stone at, ethically. GTFO.
89.
by isityouyesitsme 5y ago
Two things. - Yes, you are right that many theists equate "does not believe in God" with "would perform the most perverse and tortuous murder if given the chance." That would agitate anyone, and is not what I'm crit
90.
by isityouyesitsme 5y ago
I can't disagree with this reply. You've changed the subject, which very much was about definitions of specific words, as held by groups of people.

More ›