Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
isaacremuant
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Ah. This is it, folks. You're a liar and you project your lies. Incapable of realising how people have lived shit in history. Go google "disappeared people in military dictatorships" and maybe, just maybe, you'll learn
62.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Post your full name and address if you're so happy with lack of anonymity.
63.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Almost killed your one child. Authoritarian governments have murdered many more. At some point the disingenous concerned parents need to start dealing with their own parenting instead of pretending we need to live in 1984 just because your
64.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
I did. Your point puts national security of a boogeyman us vs them as paramount. Your point gives the authoritian the ability to use "the red scare" as tactic to ensure no subversives appear. No one to challenge their power. We m
65.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
It's not that crazy when people seem to cheer for a nanny state at every turn. Specially if said nanny state bombards them with propaganda about all the dangers they'll face if they just don't "comply". 1984 referen
66.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
I have experience of people disappeared because of totalitarianism. Your teens on the brink of self harm are peanuts compared to state murder. Try some other shitty propaganda.
67.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Hahaha. Fuck off with the "it's the enemy bullshit". You'll call people "russians" if they don't agree with your jingoism. You'll try and get people against wars fired. Post your name right now. Real
68.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
> Anonymity is not a prerequisite to freedom of speech. That's disingenous bullshit. From the likes of people who use their power imbalance to pretend their propaganda is truth and dissent is dangerous. "Freedom of speech is ok
69.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
What freedom of speech? The "first world countries" in Europe are slowly turning up the surveillance state to not let people online if they don't provide their IDs, they want to surveil every private conversation you have at
70.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Very little signal to noise in your post. It's widely used and you can do so effectively if you need it as know what you're doing.
71.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
You're missing the point. You get banned in coordination. > I don't think anyone has a fundamental right to post whatever they want on these platforms. You don't have a right to anything if you fall for the bullshit of &q
72.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
The mask thing is a lie. There's plenty of contradictory statements in news media that the mouth covers that people had were absolutely useless and for show but "looking compliant" was the important part. They went back and
73.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
He was a high profile case of social media coordinated banning. Not just one platform but many and it wasn't about court orders at the time but simply the vague "policy" which we know gets applied selectively. The particular
74.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Stop projecting. It doesn't make me uncomfortable. It makes you uncomfortable or you wouldn't try to do bullshit theater to achieve "total security". > Selfish people caused some of that Lol. Fuck off with this tired
75.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Yes. But they're censored or self censor and then basic people like you ask these types of questions. Are you even real or just a non player character with 3 pro authoritian dialogues? Do you even have personal opinions?
76.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Oh yeah. The "war against terror" post twin towers was definitely a huge milestone in the war against civil rights and featured much of the theater we were going to see in the posterior 24 years.
77.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Let's hope people remember this and don't cheer the precedent when it's set against "undesirable" like it was with Alex Jones. It always starts like that.
78.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Your first paragraph is bullshit. It's always something. "Your ideas kill me, they must be stopped". Terrorism, disease, children's safety, drugs, etc. No emergency justifies it because emergencies have a tendency of sta
79.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Yes. They were. V passports. Censorship of so called disinformation. I don't give a flying fuck if you dismiss me. You already did in 2020, 2021 and so on and I'm still here, didn't you? Now I get to see you move uncomforta
80.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Authoritianism based on an emergenc that prevents civil rights such as freedom of assembly and movement. Censorship. Lockdown. Those set the tone. Media and corporations that need to censor what people say to combat disinformation. Later
81.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Books can be made illegal. Stop giving in to authoritianism by licking proverbial boots and using their excuses for them.
82.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
We are not cooked. You only need to recognize that covid policies were theater and enabled them to rapidly advance in this direction and that the typical cultural left/right bullshit is a distraction. If people stop the bullshit it
83.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Politician and corporations want you to not have ownership or control over your devices. Either for money or control, but they absolutely would love for things like Linux to not be possible or illegal so they can force you to watch ads and
84.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
I wish we could turn off the self help twitter hybrid posts that we're getting more and more often in HACKER news.
85.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
> Even the simplest business problem may take a year to solve, and constantly break due to the astounding number of edge cases and scale. You're doing it wrong. More likely than not. > Anyone proclaiming simplicity just hasnt wor
86.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Agreed. Weird distinction to pay less to people who did certain things and you could a high variance between "data engineers". Some who had only done a course and others that had extensive knowledge of software engineering practi
87.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
People assess real risk all the time. The fact that you had to punish people and make them do performative acts was hygiene theater. You're the kind of person that said that "measures didn't work because we didn't close
88.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
> People need to stick it to the government and demand their freedoms. It will only work if they admit that they supported this and all forms of totalitarianism during COVID. You can't fall for that and then be surprised when the w
89.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
The eye doesn't care as long as you're not politically efficient in opposing their narratives or power. Authoritarianism in the UK doesn't correlate with crime. The economy does. The point of these things is not really to he
90.
▲
by
isaacremuant
1y ago
Don't worry. You'll call us conspiracy theories once you get used to the new goalposts and we warn you about the next thing. How about instead of being depressed you start being vocal and defiant?
More ›