isaacremuant

5 ms·

1.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
Mmmm... I'll make it short-ish: - I'll say goodbye for now. You've given me pause and not because I buy into the fake politeness because I think that's BS (If you may grant me that expletive). - I think bringing 11 year
2.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
It's a common Tactic to pretend children are some sort of tabula rasa full of innocent wisdom that can be use to prove points. It's ridiculous, usually fake and hide the biases of those who nurtured them to believe whatever they b
3.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
You realize that you're putting your "boring moderating reality" against the very real claims of goverments and people here to - Remove people who didn't obey the house imprisonment rules during covid from society. - Rem
4.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
If you are not doing this same thing to every comment trying to remove my freedom, which then will call me some label for disagreeing with COVID policies or whatever then I can't really take any of the guidelines seriously. I was here
5.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
How about you parent your kid instead of trying to get the government to parent everyone else's? What the hell is you and everyone else's problem who want to get into other families' business. Disgusting intrusiveness and aut
6.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
This is what the crowd shouting misinformation and "protect X" asks for all the time. You want nanny states and nanny corps and authoritianism through and through (remember covid policies?), you'll get this more and more. You
7.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
No they aren't. Of course you cans also call it's sonar eyes but it isn't. Anthropomorphizing cars doesn't make them humans either.
8.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
No. Cars don't walk. Submarines don't swim. You can call it navigation if you want but words have meaning. > to move through water by moving the body or parts of the body.
9.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
Noted. Probably the best thing would be simplified color coding in separate graphs showing 3 types of movements from worse to more efficient. And a good statement around what's the point. Conveying information through images is all abo
10.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
> A programming language is the single most expensive choice a company makes, False. Next.
11.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
Analyzing the typing experience in vim by looking at pure keystrokes would be a mistake if you don't understand the tradeoffs and benefits of having a modal system and operating the editor without leaving the home row or needing a mous
12.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
They won't have the same phones we do. Elites don't follow rules. They push them into others.
13.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
I love waymo but I think people rushing to defend this are making a mistake. It should come at a high cost to the company, if they make any sort of tragic mistake like this such that they invest a lot to not commit it again. Otherwise it&#x
14.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
Code format and conventions are not the problem. It's the complexity of the change without testing, thinking, or otherwise having ownership of your PR. Some people will absolutely just run something, let the AI work like a wizard and p
15.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
It's not optional. It auto dubs stuff assuming no one in the world speaks more than one language or would rather listen to original audio with subs
16.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
I'd say git submodules have such an awkward UX that should probably not be used except in very rare and organized cases. I've done it before but it has to be worth it. But I get your larger point.
17.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
That's great, what about when Europe does the same? https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-age-ver... It's a corporate lobbyst push and UK/Australia are just the canaries in the coalmi
18.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
Nobody wants this law but it's very common in the UK and Europe to pretend consultations make it a democratic process with good representation when it's just the typical power hungry politicians, security forces and corporate lobb
19.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
Someone's getting promoted out of it and the investment money loves it. So it doesn't matter. The hype outpaces the actual value in many cases and that's why we get the shit we get. A good example are YouTube's unavoidab
20.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
As an Australian? Dude, your country is the most authoritarian of the current English speaking "western" countries. The parliamentary countries like Australia just have made it so that they forever encroach in civil liberties and
21.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
Thoroughly unimpressed. Every one of these assistant apps always go to "send message/add something to calendar". Hopefully the actual features and interoperability prove the ad wrong and there's a game changing UX behind
22.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
It's very hard for me to answer this without being insulting: - You have been in very bad environments if you think the way you think. - Coding/typing is and wasn't the bottleneck. You're not fit to give advice to peopl
23.
by isaacremuant 11mo ago
This is so funny to me. Hand-coding is no longer "the future"? Did an AI write your post or did you "hand write it"? Code needs to be simple and maintainable and do what it needs to do. Auto complete wasn't a huge
24.
by isaacremuant 1y ago
The EU doesn't need a legal justification. They can stop Google but they actually love this because it helps their total surveillance state ideas.
25.
by isaacremuant 1y ago
It's ok. It's fine when the EU does it. It's only wrong and against capitalism when others do it. Like protectionism.
26.
by isaacremuant 1y ago
> At least 2 billion people live in dictatorships. AI has the potential to become a tool of mass surveillance and total oppression from which those countries will never recover because just like the models can detect a woman is pregnant
27.
by isaacremuant 1y ago
> Always take legislation like this seriously and hold your representatives responsible for it. Let them know that their political career in your constituency is finished for good if they support such moves But it isn't. I've g
28.
by isaacremuant 1y ago
Authoritian through and through. Go enjoy everything daddy gov tells you. If you claim it's an overreach you're a seditious agitator working for "the enemy (TM)"
29.
by isaacremuant 1y ago
This is such a disingenous comment. Yes. They did attack their sources of income and blocked protestors from accessing THEIR money to stop them from protesting. You minimizing it like "just a few accounts, just a few days" is not
30.
by isaacremuant 1y ago
You will not engage in wrongthink or else. You will not dissent effectively against the government.

More ›