iperboreo

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by iperboreo 2y ago

   I think that a person must try, for himself, adhere to the historical truth. Which many times differs from what is written in wikipedia, especially the English version of it when it speaks of the Russian people (to be fair, also the Russian
2. 2.▲
   by iperboreo 3y ago

   Sorry, I have work to do (as probably also you), so I will be brief. "after russia invaded in 2014": Crimea was taken away, this yes, while the uprise in Donbass was, as far as I know, spontaneous, with tacit Russian support; both
3. 3.▲
   by iperboreo 3y ago

   I will point to the fact that before the collapse of Soviet Union, most Ukranians did not see any difference between them and Russians, and most of them voted for keeping Soviet Union intact in the referendum held on 17.3.1991 (as in most o
4. 4.▲
   by iperboreo 3y ago

   " if you have anything to say about the matter." Effectively banning Russian language (they cannot, but they do try), tacit license to use violence against people who see themselves as Russians (massacre of Odessa, other cases), t
5. 5.▲
   by iperboreo 3y ago

   You are flattering yourself. The level of US people's acquaintance with anything outside of their country is well known across the world, and I am afraid that the information you get from your media is not as informative as you think.