int0x80

19 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by int0x80 8y ago

   If it does LTO it gets worse. Maybe you can disable it for dev, if its enabled?
2. 152.▲
   by int0x80 8y ago

   you can have anon structs an unions on gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Unnamed-Fields.html
3. 153.▲
   by int0x80 8y ago

   Very nice, but bummer for me is: Limtations (not supported): - docker exec - docker swarm Specially 'exec' part.
4. 154.▲
   by int0x80 8y ago

   It may be false by other means, but the fact that other orgs do the same is irrelevant.
5. 155.▲
   by int0x80 8y ago

   That doesn't make it less true.
6. 156.▲
   by int0x80 8y ago

   If you are rutinely making $500M SoCs, you can benefit yourself too of the automation/process improvement (as an established actor).
7. 157.▲
   by int0x80 8y ago

   Agree.
8. 158.▲
   by int0x80 8y ago

   Absolutely. strncpy is a very badly designed interface. Is it documented? Yes. Does that make it any good? No. Principle of least surprise. Idiot proof. Semantics that match common usage. Call it what you like.
9. 159.▲
   by int0x80 8y ago

   Yes, I dont like the strncpy interface, it is very error prone. I just gave it as a posibility. But I did refer to the man page and said "various truncation semantics" because of that, precisely, without going into more detail tho
10. 160.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    You are right. Fixed.
11. 161.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    It is wrong in many ways. It copies s and then t to a fixed size buffer, without any checks. That will write to invalid memory (probably smashing the stack) if len(s), len(t) or len(s) + len(t) > 100. It returns a stack allocated buffer
12. 162.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    That was exactly my first thought. Do we just assume javascript this days? Not even a title or two liner of what is going on.
13. 163.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Do you think he's going to sell his ideas for an upvote?
14. 164.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Why do you want that?
15. 165.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Edit: I'm happy to be wrong. It seems the cross-domain checks dont allow this. I missunderstood stuff on the article/thread. I want to say a few things regarding "insecurtity" of localhost. I find it completely insane an
16. 166.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    You can use nc (netcat). If you have a 10G ethernet you will not saturate it because you will be limited by disk IO (I get 1Gb/s disk reads for a M.2 SSD). I you can read from disk faster, netcat alone will not saturate a 10G link, pro
17. 167.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Nicely put.
18. 168.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    tar cf - src/ | ssh $host "tar -C /dest/dir -xf -"
19. 169.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    There are multiple sites like this. I dont know the size limits (I just upload small stuff) etc but here are a few I use: http://ix.io https://ptpb.pw
20. 170.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    What amazes me is that they do not test this extremely specific uarch code when a new uarch is released. On the other hand, I think the hack is not in using the pause instruction itself, but that crazy backoff algo. For example Linux uses p
21. 171.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Thanks for the info. And great product you have!
22. 172.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Yeah, that I knew, also Aho from dragon book :)
23. 173.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    ha! TIL
24. 174.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Thanks! Didnt try it, just couldnt find it in the examples.
25. 175.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Absolutely. But is unexpected for me at least. But thinking of it, maybe you can log everything and if something bad happens you can blame the origin IP who ever that is. You can also ratelimit the outbound conections to avoid abuses etc. I
26. 176.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Ok. One question that bothers me. Why repl.it and company permit internet access through their sandboxes? How is that not restricted? I can just annonymously run stuff and use them as a proxy. That is a big no-no in my book, but I must be m
27. 177.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Looks good. I miss beeing able to pipe sql to the client via stdin. At least I didnt see it in the README.
28. 178.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Ah, good. Thank you.
29. 179.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    I agree. Im not saying this is the solution, but is not a bad API, that is what I say. A cross plat. and OSS would be great, absolutely. But as others have said those apis usually come out of defacto standards that people adopt. Probably ad
30. 180.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Where do they say their network stack is userspace? I watched the video but the last 10 minutes and I missed it.