Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
int0x80
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
181.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
1st thing: The people here asking if they are going to deprecate BSD sockets. No way that is going to happen. We are talking about 30yo+ API deeply integrated in the kernel, unix and userspace. OpenGL/CL is a very very different case.
182.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
What you say is not wrong but people have very good debuggin tools for kernels. You can surely make a small debuggin monitoring layer in the unikernel and instrumentation. If it is not already done, Im sure it will be soon.
183.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
What good $10/month servers do you know? Genuinely interested.
184.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
Thanks very much for the clarification. Indeed it looks very useful.
185.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
Wow man, what an observer! I didnt even see the computer in the first place.
186.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
Hi. What is this exactly? Skimming through the site didnt give me a clear detailed explanation. Is it a programming api to chrome? As in: host:~$ ./browserless-app example.com # will fetch an interact using js/DOM with the web @
187.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
Yes, all I'm saying is: _some_ people; and only a _little bit_.
188.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
I think it is a long term goal. "Old" schoolers have and will likely have for ever that evil 90s vision of MS. However it is changing a bit in that people too. They still may be evil, but at least the look more modern (opensourc
189.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
>>If you tear out something like jQuery, you’re going to have to figure out a way to get those accordions to expand and collapse again. If you tear out React, you get a blank page. React is a big commitment. >This is probably the o
190.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
Sorry but I dont follow. I hope you can clarify. What's the disadvantage for providing a PTR -> sfo07-blah.google.com instead of sfo07-blah.1e100.net? Browser will send cookies to X.google.com and it will not to X.1e100.net. Ok. B
191.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
Just a nitpick. Implementation is about the particular compiler and runtime (stdlib) implementation, not the hardware. Hardware is the platform hosting the implementation (this are ISO C-standard defined terms). A compiler targeting x86 pla
192.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
Thats nice, so is the article's examples. But what I always need to lookup is how to make the operations work on especific columns, rather than on whole lines. I mean without resorting to awk.
193.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
It is c++. The file is .c but whatever. They use a lot of c++. I agree with you however. Having worked with the code gnu relies a lot on macros & a lot of auto generated code. The code is a big mess, imposible to tackle if you dont spen
194.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
Agree. If you want to do shell work in something closer to the shell and have a real programming language, Perl is the winner.
195.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
A good thing of forums is that you get everything as is. As raw as it gets. If you don't like something or someone you just block it. You can also have privileged threads/subforums that are read only if you don't meet some re
196.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
Microservices? No bash though
197.
▲
by
int0x80
8y ago
Analisis on why (software) prefetch is problematic and not a win generally (especially interesting are the results obtained by I. Molnar linked in the article): https://lwn.net/Articles/444336/
198.
▲
by
int0x80
9y ago
That is why I say it is not black and white. In Europe we've had both social and liberal goverments. None of them one-sided radicals. The same in the US. If you ask me, I like a very thin and light weight state, with some regulations,
199.
▲
by
int0x80
9y ago
Absolutely? So we are worse than a century ago you say? I won't claim to know the comunism/capitalist theorys or models at all but you are making this an absolute black or white argument. It is not anymore. The developed countrys
200.
▲
by
int0x80
9y ago
Yes, I see what you mean. In cases of extreme poverty, everything is complicated. The problem is there wether we change/evolve the productive model or not. The problem is there right now and it was there 50 years ago, 100 years ago and
201.
▲
by
int0x80
9y ago
Yes, I agree. That is a problem. But that is not a new problem. That has nothing to do with technology. In today's world and 100 years ago, there are lots of poor and miserable people. Wars, corruption, explotation. Africa, Asia, South
202.
▲
by
int0x80
9y ago
If there is a future where the technology sector rules everything, then the logical thing is that (almost) everyone is onboard on that sector. That sector will be huge and will have many segments and specializations. In other words, people
203.
▲
Linux Kernel: Convert to C++
(lkml.org)
4 points
by
int0x80
9y ago
|
2 comments
204.
▲
by
int0x80
9y ago
Gotten worse if anything. Chips are more complex, more features etc. Things pile up for compatibility. That is a good and a bad thing.
205.
▲
by
int0x80
9y ago
Using a compiler partially written in c++ is very different from writting and mantaining a kernel (or whatever) in c++.
206.
▲
by
int0x80
9y ago
I was also looking for it and couldn't find it. You can't do much with the stack if you can't load/store.
207.
▲
by
int0x80
9y ago
This is very true. I've seen very ignorant (on c++) people say that they dont find c++ complex at all, but very simple. Most of the time this only shows the lack of deep knowledge on the language.
208.
▲
by
int0x80
9y ago
> embedding C++ code into Perl What could posibly go wrong. No seriously, the project looks amazing.
209.
▲
by
int0x80
9y ago
In Linux, from the manpage: "The only signals that can be sent to process ID 1, the init process, are those for which init has explicitly installed signal handlers. This is done to assure the system is not brought down accide
210.
▲
by
int0x80
9y ago
mm usually PID 1 is unkillable even by root AFAIK.
More ›