Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
imgabe
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
481.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
It's crazy to me that the phone hasn't locked automatically. Do people really walk around with their phones set to never lock and turn the screen off? Mine times out after 5 minutes.
482.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
Nobody deserves anything. That implies some kind of cosmic force or entity that is keeping track of who does what and enforcing some kind of justice. People get what they figure out how to get and they keep it as long as they figure out how
483.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
Oh my god, thank you! This has been a constant minor annoyance to me since switching to a Mac. I always use Notepad as a kind of extended clipboard on Windows.
484.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
I never claimed that the case is invalid on its face or I know more about this than the lawyers. It's worth noting that the NLRB is not some disinterested third party who is only trying to find the objective truth. They are an advocate
485.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
> Given that both of us have acknowledged we're not lawyers - we should assume the NLRB understands this better than us, right? Maybe. Maybe they just don't like Musk so they throw everything they can at him regardless of merit
486.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
> (By the way, the phrase "DEI" doesn't appear in the letter, either.) From the letter: > But for all our technical achievements, SpaceX fails to apply these principles to the promotion of diversity, equity, and inclus
487.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
I'm not disputing that they were fired for the letter, I'm disputing that the letter is a protected discussion of workplace conditions.
488.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
I'm not misrepresenting what you said, I'm refuting it. You established a chain of logic like so: If something affects the share price, then it is relevant to business operations Musk's tweets affect the share pri
489.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
I kinda think "workplace conditions" would mean, you know, the conditions in which you do your work, like the physical environment where you are working. If the safety straps are old and frayed or the air conditioning in the offic
490.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
I think the question is whether the boss's personal social media account is part of their workplace conditions. A safety strap is definitely a part of the work place. If your job is not social media manager and you don't work at T
491.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
NAL, but I think they would also have to prove that the thing they were fired in retaliation for is something you're actually not allowed to fire people for. You can fire people in retaliation for stealing or screwing up or for wast
492.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
Kind of a bold statement when looking at the definition of "protected concerted activity" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_concerted_activity It doesn't say anything about controlling your employe
493.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
8 out of 13,000 employees wanted to circulate a letter complaining about Musk's tweets and the Labor board claims they were "illegally" fired over this. Which law specifically requires employers to permit every employee to sp
494.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
Nobody cares about being "extremely greedy" if the company succeeds. If the "extremely greedy" CEO negotiates hard on the company's behalf and gets price concessions from vendors and drives high profits, nobody is g
495.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
Having the leverage to negotiate high compensation means you also have the leverage to negotiate limited downside. If they were the kind of person who wasn't savvy enough to negotiate well for themselves, would you want them negotiatin
496.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
More responsibility. CEOs will be responsible for decisions that could make or break the company. Regular employees generally don't have to worry that something they do might cause the entire company to go out of business and lose ever
497.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
If you could take a copy of the car, leaving the original at the dealership, and the likelihood of experiencing any penalty were the same as pirating a movie, yes you would. Nice false analogy though. If it were possible to make infinite pe
498.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
I pay for four different streaming services. If it's not on one of those, I'm going to pirate it. Also, since I live outside the US various services won't even let me give them money if I wanted to. I assume they are then ok
499.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
The people who control the IP for most media did not create it.
500.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
Personally, I would rather have a doctor who helps me get better rather than one who represents my community. I'm not really caring about how well my "community" is represented when I'm sick or injured. And anyway, since
501.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
That’s why they put all those pictures and descriptions on book covers.
502.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
Maybe. Maybe the alternatives available at the time were believed to result in something 10x worse than the Khmer Rouge. Would he still be a bastard then? Or someone who had to make a hard choice among terrible options? I don't know, f
503.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
There is always a rational view, whether it falls as centrist on the political ideology spectrum of the times is immaterial.
504.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
The podcast, no. But if a comment is going to offer a link with the conceit of “consume this to fully understand who this person was” it would be good if the source were not something with the explicitly stated thesis of “hey, this guy’s a
505.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
Which makes it such a shame that people throw them around like they are an authoritative source of anything. It’s literally just some guy who read a book and has a microphone. It’s as good as whatever book they read.
506.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
It’s co-hosted by the guys from The Dollop, who I’ve listened to quite a lot. They’re funny and entertaining, but they’re comedians not historians. Their whole schtick is just reading some book and incredulously saying “holy shit” about wha
507.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
Reading through the descriptions of the episodes of this podcast it seems a lot like they start with a conclusion and then confirmation bias themselves (and everyone else who already agrees with them). Maybe not the most objective source.
508.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
If you are wondering if there is baking soda in a container, you could pour some vinegar in there. If there is no bubbling of carbon dioxide, then there was no baking soda. This is not circular logic, this is an observation that necessary e
509.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
Where do you find the objective reference value of all things including marketing courses? Do you have a big book with the true value of everything in it? People have different amounts of money and value things differently. $30k to me woul
510.
▲
by
imgabe
3y ago
Spotify is a for-profit company and if they could raise prices without losing customers they would.
More ›