I never claimed that the case is invalid on its face or I know more about this than the lawyers. It's worth noting that the NLRB is not some disinterested third

I never claimed that the case is invalid on its face or I know more about this than the lawyers. It's worth noting that the NLRB is not some disinterested third party who is only trying to find the objective truth. They are an advocate for one side. There is another side. The NLRB is going to promote arguments that reinforce their side and ignore or downplay anything that does not support their case. That is not a conspiracy, that is literally how the adversarial justice system works. I am not saying it can't be related to working conditions, I'm presenting an argument for why I think it's not. Of course, the NLRB's argument is that it is related to working conditions, that is their job to make that argument. But it's just that, an argument. It's not some divine truth revealed to us by the holy authority of the NLRB.